K3VR OWNS K1MAN AND ALWAYS HAS!
Brian Crow won; I lost. I owe the FCC 21,000 Big Ones…
Brian ‘Psycho CROW’ K3VR FRAUDulently about Glenn K1MAN on www.aboutus.org <23 Aug ‘08
I often assist the FCC and other federal agencies in the apprehension of radio pirates, sane and otherwise. [ß No wonder the FCC/Excited States of HAMereeka is in such un-Holy mess!]
Brian ‘Psycho CROW’ K3VR proving that ~‘it takes a thief to catch a thief’, from one of his Bios <23 Aug ‘08
John Winthrop, Governor of Massachusetts Bay Colony, was the son of Adam Winthrop, son of Adam, (my wife's grandfather) Lord of Groton Manor.
My grandfather, Reverend Nathan Mason and his wife Experience Lewis left Swansea Massachusetts in 1763.
Hezekiah Mason, also my grandfather and a descendent of Reverend Nathan Mason….
Brian ‘Psycho CROW’ K3VR ‘foreshortens time’ on command, from one of his Bios <23 Aug ‘08
After I received my Bachelor's degree [ß in basket-weaving, “with an emphasis in Sociology”], I immediately went to work for General Electric (GE)… in their Defense Systems division…. Logistics Management Training Program… in what my manager called 'an effort to bring literacy to the management ranks.'… [ß i.e. Brian taught remedial American English to future warehousemen.]
In a short time I had invented and fielded a computerized database [ß in his off-hours presumably, using his B.A. “with an emphasis in Sociology”, HI] for maintaining major equipment modules…. I was in charge of the tools and test equipment provisioning system and site support…. [ß i.e. Brian was a glorified warehouse stock-man/geek with a DB.]
I had an attack of conscience [ß the one and only in his life, HI] as I realized that my daily routine consisted of perfecting weapons systems [ß read: keeping track of $1,000 “gold-plated” wrenches in the test tool-crib] which might conceivably bring about the loss of life of hundreds of thousands of people in a single moment. Now I realize the value of deterrence, but at 30 I decided that I wanted to devote my life to improving the human condition. [ß For the results of Brian’s “noble experiment”, carefully re-read this entire page—and weep!]
Brian ‘Psycho CROW’ K3VR ‘waxing’ about himself, from one of his Bios <23 Aug ‘08
Tuesday, June 29, 2010
Monday, June 28, 2010
Sunday, June 27, 2010
I've worked in a private school for emotionally disturbed children; at an agency for [delinquent] Latino immigrant youth; in a community mental health center for severely disturbed adults; in a University program [ß was this “at” the ‘Banquet Facility’ or “under the auspices of” the University?] for young adults referred for alcohol abuse; at an inpatient facility for drug and alcohol addicts…. [ß What happened to the work you supposedly did for the ‘rag-heads’ at the Moronville Center for Human in-Dignity (CHD)?]
Brian ‘Psycho CROW’ K3VR knows about ‘Crazies’ because he is one, from one of his Bios <23 Aug ‘08
Hard to believe Summer is over and it's time to prepare for the upcoming holidays!
Brian ‘Life is a box of chocolates’ CROW K3VR just off his Summer holidays preparing for Saturnalia 1 Sep ‘08
I was on the production team as a DoD contractor liaison to the Navy, for GE Ordnance/Defense Systems, back in 1987 when GE (Pittsfield) was named as a 2nd source provider for the Phalanx, Close-in Weapons System (CIWS)….
We called it 'Christ it Won't Shoot' at first because, it was VERY complex, tons of moving parts, and it broke down quite a bit until design changes remedied most of the problems [ß The system worked ~well, at sea, for ~10 years by then. Some GE “production team”!]. Later we called it the 'Sea-Whiz.' [ß No you didn’t, Brian! The acronym CIWS/its vernacular ‘sounding’ obviously pre-dated its deployment to the Fleet.]
Brian
Brian ‘I worked in/for/had-coffee-on-contract-with DoD’ CROW K3VR on Jon K1TP’s ATWT ~17 Oct ‘08
Brian ‘Psycho CROW’ K3VR knows about ‘Crazies’ because he is one, from one of his Bios <23 Aug ‘08
Hard to believe Summer is over and it's time to prepare for the upcoming holidays!
Brian ‘Life is a box of chocolates’ CROW K3VR just off his Summer holidays preparing for Saturnalia 1 Sep ‘08
I was on the production team as a DoD contractor liaison to the Navy, for GE Ordnance/Defense Systems, back in 1987 when GE (Pittsfield) was named as a 2nd source provider for the Phalanx, Close-in Weapons System (CIWS)….
We called it 'Christ it Won't Shoot' at first because, it was VERY complex, tons of moving parts, and it broke down quite a bit until design changes remedied most of the problems [ß The system worked ~well, at sea, for ~10 years by then. Some GE “production team”!]. Later we called it the 'Sea-Whiz.' [ß No you didn’t, Brian! The acronym CIWS/its vernacular ‘sounding’ obviously pre-dated its deployment to the Fleet.]
Brian
Brian ‘I worked in/for/had-coffee-on-contract-with DoD’ CROW K3VR on Jon K1TP’s ATWT ~17 Oct ‘08
Friday, June 25, 2010
Many [ß Better than your usual “lots”, Brian.]
Canadian amateurs have made numerous [ß Ditto! But still hyperbolic. Do I hear your 1001 ’QeerZ’ re Glenn K1MAN fashion?]
complaints to Industry Canada regarding Karol Madera's misuse of the airwaves [ß Read Contra Preferentum, SVP.].
All complainants [ß Are you sure, Brian? If so, surprise, surprise, you’re involved in a Criminal Conspiracy!]
have discussed Jim Laursen's lackadaisical performance and attitude [ß Bravo! Brian. Marginally better than “What Does Baxter Think”, but still ‘no cigar’.]
regarding their legitimate concerns [ß “All” of their “concerns”, or just some of them? And, who decides their legitimacy? Both are rhetorical, Brian. We know….].
A petition [ß Bravo again, Brian! Just what we need: another Petition!]
to have Laursen removed and/or sued for failure to perform is said to be presently in the works [ß Sure it is, Brian. But, what happened to the ones you started against me?].
We will have more news as events proceed [ß Events don’t proceed, they unfold, Fucktard!].
Brian ‘Fucktard’ CROW K3VR in “RAC TAKING AIM AT VE7KFM” [yeah, right] on Rambo’s Blog 18 Nov ‘08
Industry Canada receives complaints [ß a.k.a. Brian’s “put up jobs”], and they react cordially (most of the time) [ß except when they hang up on Brian, HI] but there has been absolutely no concrete and effective action taken [ß Bravo, Jimbo] regarding Canada's worst amateur radio operator [ß thanks for the left-handed accolade]. For some reason Jim Laursen, at IC, in Victoria, has utterly failed to effectively address the problem. Karol Madera, VE7KFM, resides… a mere 2 miles from Laursen's office…. [ß hint, hint, Fucktard]
We believe that one license revocation in CANADA, would immediately relieve 99% of the problems on the 20 meter band, throughout North America. [ß Do I hear the World, Psycho? Obviously, sucking Riley’s cock for ~5 years was injurious to Brian’s mental health.]
Brian ‘Psycho CROW’ K3VR on his www.suckK3VRoff.com [thanks for the ‘heads up’ Jimbo] ~20 Nov ‘08
Diversity is what makes ham radio interesting. [ß Yeah, right! Just read his own words, on this page alone!]
Brian ‘Biggest Radio Hypocrite’ CROW K3VR in “Doofs on 3.885” on QRZ.com 25 Jan ‘09
Canadian amateurs have made numerous [ß Ditto! But still hyperbolic. Do I hear your 1001 ’QeerZ’ re Glenn K1MAN fashion?]
complaints to Industry Canada regarding Karol Madera's misuse of the airwaves [ß Read Contra Preferentum, SVP.].
All complainants [ß Are you sure, Brian? If so, surprise, surprise, you’re involved in a Criminal Conspiracy!]
have discussed Jim Laursen's lackadaisical performance and attitude [ß Bravo! Brian. Marginally better than “What Does Baxter Think”, but still ‘no cigar’.]
regarding their legitimate concerns [ß “All” of their “concerns”, or just some of them? And, who decides their legitimacy? Both are rhetorical, Brian. We know….].
A petition [ß Bravo again, Brian! Just what we need: another Petition!]
to have Laursen removed and/or sued for failure to perform is said to be presently in the works [ß Sure it is, Brian. But, what happened to the ones you started against me?].
We will have more news as events proceed [ß Events don’t proceed, they unfold, Fucktard!].
Brian ‘Fucktard’ CROW K3VR in “RAC TAKING AIM AT VE7KFM” [yeah, right] on Rambo’s Blog 18 Nov ‘08
Industry Canada receives complaints [ß a.k.a. Brian’s “put up jobs”], and they react cordially (most of the time) [ß except when they hang up on Brian, HI] but there has been absolutely no concrete and effective action taken [ß Bravo, Jimbo] regarding Canada's worst amateur radio operator [ß thanks for the left-handed accolade]. For some reason Jim Laursen, at IC, in Victoria, has utterly failed to effectively address the problem. Karol Madera, VE7KFM, resides… a mere 2 miles from Laursen's office…. [ß hint, hint, Fucktard]
We believe that one license revocation in CANADA, would immediately relieve 99% of the problems on the 20 meter band, throughout North America. [ß Do I hear the World, Psycho? Obviously, sucking Riley’s cock for ~5 years was injurious to Brian’s mental health.]
Brian ‘Psycho CROW’ K3VR on his www.suckK3VRoff.com [thanks for the ‘heads up’ Jimbo] ~20 Nov ‘08
Diversity is what makes ham radio interesting. [ß Yeah, right! Just read his own words, on this page alone!]
Brian ‘Biggest Radio Hypocrite’ CROW K3VR in “Doofs on 3.885” on QRZ.com 25 Jan ‘09
Ms. Laura contacted me and introduced herself today. We had a great chat. Talked for about an hour, to an hour and a half, about family [ß Family? Ohh, I forgot: you’re “The Family Guy”.], and her work at the FCC, and some of her philosophy of enforcement, etc.
I found her to be extremely pleasant, and fun, with a great sense of humor, and a good, hopeful perspective about the future of the service.
She asked for my assistance [ß And Jesus wept!] and listened patiently to my (many and varied) opinions on enforcement and ham radio. It was almost like chatting with an old friend. [ß Or at least a ‘friend of a friend’, since ‘Rot’ Riley may have sent her….]
She says she has the full support of her superiors at the Commission, and although she has a backlog of 6 months of enforcement issues to catch up on, I got the impression that she'll be up to speed in no time at all.
I wish her all the luck in the world and I can already tell she's very fair minded [ß Unlike you, Brian, I’ll wait for her results] and she'll able [sic] to sort the wheat from the chaff in no time at all. [ß I hope so, Brian, because then you’ll be relegated to the dustbin of amateur radio history, where you so patently belong.]
My only concern is that government resources aren't all they could be, in terms of support for her position, but that's not a problem limited to the Commission right now. All agencies will have to allocate monies and prioritize accordingly. [ß But, but, only two sentences earlier, above, you state that “she has the full support of her superiors at the Commission”. So which is it? Does she or does she not have “full support”? Or are these your psychoses/multiple personae ‘discordantly opining’ as usual?]
Overall, I was very favorably impressed [ß I’m so glad you were “very” impressed, Brian.] and I think she'll be a valuable addition to the Enforcement Bureau and to the Amateur radio service.
Good Luck Laura! [ß I could not have said it better myself!]
Brian ‘Inconsistent CROW’ K3VR trying to snooker “Laura L. Smith Successor to RH” on QRZ.com 29 Jan ‘09
I found her to be extremely pleasant, and fun, with a great sense of humor, and a good, hopeful perspective about the future of the service.
She asked for my assistance [ß And Jesus wept!] and listened patiently to my (many and varied) opinions on enforcement and ham radio. It was almost like chatting with an old friend. [ß Or at least a ‘friend of a friend’, since ‘Rot’ Riley may have sent her….]
She says she has the full support of her superiors at the Commission, and although she has a backlog of 6 months of enforcement issues to catch up on, I got the impression that she'll be up to speed in no time at all.
I wish her all the luck in the world and I can already tell she's very fair minded [ß Unlike you, Brian, I’ll wait for her results] and she'll able [sic] to sort the wheat from the chaff in no time at all. [ß I hope so, Brian, because then you’ll be relegated to the dustbin of amateur radio history, where you so patently belong.]
My only concern is that government resources aren't all they could be, in terms of support for her position, but that's not a problem limited to the Commission right now. All agencies will have to allocate monies and prioritize accordingly. [ß But, but, only two sentences earlier, above, you state that “she has the full support of her superiors at the Commission”. So which is it? Does she or does she not have “full support”? Or are these your psychoses/multiple personae ‘discordantly opining’ as usual?]
Overall, I was very favorably impressed [ß I’m so glad you were “very” impressed, Brian.] and I think she'll be a valuable addition to the Enforcement Bureau and to the Amateur radio service.
Good Luck Laura! [ß I could not have said it better myself!]
Brian ‘Inconsistent CROW’ K3VR trying to snooker “Laura L. Smith Successor to RH” on QRZ.com 29 Jan ‘09
Wednesday, June 23, 2010
Ed,
I hope you're not feeling frustrated or like people here are ganging up on you. Let me share a few thoughts with you. I personally know approximately 20 people who've objected to several of the behaviors you've engaged in as a matter of routine over the past couple of years. [ß Brian, this page alone evidences > 1,000 quotations, by > 1,000 individuals, typically ID’d by name/call-sign/source, about > 1,000 of YOUR psychotic behaviours and/or FRAUDulent posts over the ~same time period. Your point therefore is?]
N1FM, VE7DCW, NA4BH, N2RJ, N8GAV, and KB1OHK, are just a few of them. [ß They’re ALL your toadies, Brian. And 6 is a long way from 20 but admittedly better than your usual “tons” or “lots”.] K3JN and N5PVL also had comments in this thread, relative to what I'm going to discuss. I can't speak for any of them, and I would never presume to [ß You’re too modest, Psycho—remember when you presumed to know what Glenn K1MAN “thought”?], but I can speak for myself. [ß Don’t stop there, Brian, speak for CMSPIRG also!]
I'll list these behaviors for you, which I've personally observed, for your consideration. This list isn't meant to demean you in any way, or to make you feel bad. [ß Of course not, Brian.] It's simply meant as feedback that could be useful in your future interactions, in situations involving others, like amateur radio, journalism, and politics. [ß Politics?]
+ Again, these are just my observations; take them or leave them; this is not an attack, and; this is meant to be helpful, not hurtful. [ß We know already, Brian! But, ’me thinks thou doth protest much too much’….]
+ You entered this thread in attack mode. [ß Huhh?] You have a history of this behavior. [ß You mean like your 1,000+ event history, on this page alone?] When people rebut your (often) hostile, inaccurate, and/or distorted observations, you (often) get defensive, and you start whining. [ß You mean like you’re doing now?]
+ Many of your unkind words [ß OK…. How do Ed’s “unkind words” compare to your FRAUDulent ones, Brian?] here have been re-printed on at least one web page, one of which is infamous for delusional libel. [ß How does that “one” compare to your dozen+ psychotic ones, Brian?] "Delusional" in this case, is expressed in classical terms, meaning, divorced from reality. "Libel" is defined as harmful writing, of fraudulent provenance, having no basis in fact. [ß I taught I taw a putty tat, Laura.]
+ Most people naturally resent unkind, libelous, inaccurate words which appear to be archived on the net 'forever.' [ß We finally agree on something! Been looking in the mirror again, Brian? BTW I don’t have an “Archive”, but understand that you do….]
+ When challenged, and asked to remove your comments [ß You mean like Bogdan W4EEH above?], you've referred to their challenges as "threats" and have even made comments about "getting the police involved," which is not only naive, it's kind of silly, isn't it? [ß Admit it, Brian: It’s only “silly” if it’s even contemplated against you….]
+ You've called other people liars, frauds, snitches, lunatics, hypocrites, and band cops, and you've publicly accused them of breaking federal law. These comments are all archived on the internet, yet, you portray yourself as a victim. [ß Surprise, surprise, Brian, because as this page amply proves, you made him so….]
+ You associated yourself with a well known Canadian by engaging him on the air [ß Wow, Ed: Guilt by distant association. Report to GITMO!], and by joining his Yahoo group [ß NOT “his”, Brian. Also, recall that 2+ years ago you had him banned by the yahoos on Yahoo!], the purpose of which, was solely to defame others. [ß Brian now presumes to know others’ SOLE motive! The Hubris! Or, was he simply looking in the mirror?]
The group violated Yahoo terms of service, and it was taken down. [ß Bravo, again, Brian!] Yet, to this day, I've never seen you take responsibility for your actions. I've never seen any indication from you that your actions may have been ill-advised. [ß Mirror, mirror, wherefore art thou, mirror?]
+ You've characterized people who've merely commented on information you've discussed publicly as having 'attacked' you somehow. Comments about things you introduce into public debate are not attacks, they're simply observations based in fact. [ß No Brian. Admit it, most of your comments are “Faith Based”.]
+ You appeared out of the blue, as a very inexperienced amateur, but you acted as though you had "all the answers." You still often act as though you have all the answers. Unfortunately, your conclusions are often inaccurate, your accusations wrong, and many of your words, hurtful. [ßCry me a river, Brian. Even if true, for the sake of argument only, at least they’re not FRAUDulent, like most of your writings!] As a rule, people react negatively to these behaviors. Can you honestly blame them?
+ You were banned briefly, and you took a break, but you came back, apparently, with the same attitudes and behaviors. [ß Brian, maybe if you had bought Ed some knee pads, like you supplied to your toadies ID’d earlier, he’d have ‘adopted a different attitude’, HI….]
This is not the only site where people have tried to gently point out some of these problematic behaviors. Both Paul [N1LAF] and Ryan [N2RJ], and others, have tried to help you, gently, but firmly, much as I'm attempting to do now. [ß Brian likes to ‘slip it in’ gently but firmly, HI….]
+ Many of the comments posted by you, reside on a web page, right next to other harmful comments [ß Is this more of your ‘guilt by association’ Psycho?], which were invented by a person, or persons, who entered qrz, and other forums, under false pretenses, using false names, making false claims. [ß Brian, you sure seem to know a lot about ‘falseness’….]
+ On investigation, these harmful comments were removed by responsible moderators [ß You mean by Terry GRAVES K7FE your FRAUDulent ‘QeerZ’ mole? BTW Is Terry any relation to Matthew ‘Pulitzer Putz’ GRAVES KB3FQN of CMSPIRG/SARC infamy?]. Yet, they still exist on a page hosted by an associate of yours [ß The “Canadian Army of One”, by definition, has no associates, Dimmi.] right next to your comments, as some sort of phony testament for the woefully naive. The page where your comments are archived is inherently and demonstrably deceptive, libelous, and harmful. [ß But unlike yours, Brian, which is un-attributed, anonymous, cloaked and FRAUDulent--the other webpage/’other hand clapping’ is overt, signed, and even © so, your point is, Psycho?]
+ I know the comments are yours, because you posted them here first, then they were removed. Next, they were copied, and posted on a distant server, where they still exist, today. [ß Huhh? First they were posted. Then they were removed. Next, they were copied and posted? Obviously, Brian’s sucking Riley’s cock for years has been deleterious to his reasoning ability/mental health.]
+ I think a person genuinely interested in 'peace' would contact the owner(s) of those blogs and pages and have those comments removed. [ß Neville CHAMBERLAIN, much more modestly, was only interested in “peace in our time” and look what it wrought….]
+ The mere association of your name, and your inaccurate, harmful comments, alongside comments posted under fraudulent pretenses, doesn't look good for your credibility, honesty and probity, all of which are a litmus test for public office (where honest politicians are concerned). [ß Ed, if English were not the 4th language I learned, I would swear that this was a threat/attempt at ~blackmail.]
+ The fact is, your association with this person or persons creates an appearance of impropriety. [ß Is that anything like your ‘snitching’ association with the quasi-Criminal regime at the FCC under Riley’s tenure?] I believe a wise man, with a desire to enter a career in politics, would attend to this immediately. [ß Ed, just in case you missed it, this again is a thinly veiled threat/attempt at extortion!]
+ The page where your comments are posted, is shared [ß Wrong, Brian. Presenting opinion as fact, as is your usual, is actionable, Psycho.] between a Canadian amateur and an amateur in Michigan (banned here and elsewhere) who falsely reported 7 amateurs to child protective services for "child pandering." The fact that your comments are posted in association with the other comments I mentioned, doesn't engender respect for you. Quite the contrary. [ß What is the penalty in PA for swearing a False Affidavit, Brian?]
+ The Michigan amateur spends much of his time flooding usenet groups with thousands of delusional comments, preventing others from using the usenet service. [ß But, does he block your IPN like you routinely do to others, Psycho?]
+ Like it or not, your documented association, cooperation, and participation in groups with people like this, affects how others perceive you. [ß Mirror for Brian please!]
+ Four of your associates from the Yahoo group are banned from several sites. [ß Yawn….] One used another person's callsign illegally, for years, another broke into qrz under false pretenses, stealing an elderly hams callsign to post defamation [ß Is that anything like what you did to Pan Benjamin BIALY W9TKJ an ill octogenarian from IL when you used his name, his call-sign and made-up FRAUDulent e-mail using his call-sign (which someone additionally inserted in his QRZ call-sign DB), despite Benjamin NEVER having had a computer in his life, all in order to try to snooker me?], another is... well, I don't really thing [sic] you want to be associated with ANY of them.
+ It might be time to consider past actions, and words written in haste, and to try to reconcile with people you've offended and harmed. We all need to practice tempering our words in the future; thinking before we hit the send key. Why not ask these people to remove your harmful words from the internet; bury the hatchet, and move on?
Having said all this, I take complete responsibility for my actions [ß Yeahh, right!]. If I've offended you, in any way, I apologize, now, and for any of my past comments, which were wholly made in reaction to the behaviors noted above. [ß Sad, really. Brian does NOT even know what constitutes an unequivocal apology.]
Brian
Brian K3VR peeking from under his ‘Mask of Sanity’, for “Laura L. Smith Successor to RH” on QRZ.com 1 Feb ‘09
I hope you're not feeling frustrated or like people here are ganging up on you. Let me share a few thoughts with you. I personally know approximately 20 people who've objected to several of the behaviors you've engaged in as a matter of routine over the past couple of years. [ß Brian, this page alone evidences > 1,000 quotations, by > 1,000 individuals, typically ID’d by name/call-sign/source, about > 1,000 of YOUR psychotic behaviours and/or FRAUDulent posts over the ~same time period. Your point therefore is?]
N1FM, VE7DCW, NA4BH, N2RJ, N8GAV, and KB1OHK, are just a few of them. [ß They’re ALL your toadies, Brian. And 6 is a long way from 20 but admittedly better than your usual “tons” or “lots”.] K3JN and N5PVL also had comments in this thread, relative to what I'm going to discuss. I can't speak for any of them, and I would never presume to [ß You’re too modest, Psycho—remember when you presumed to know what Glenn K1MAN “thought”?], but I can speak for myself. [ß Don’t stop there, Brian, speak for CMSPIRG also!]
I'll list these behaviors for you, which I've personally observed, for your consideration. This list isn't meant to demean you in any way, or to make you feel bad. [ß Of course not, Brian.] It's simply meant as feedback that could be useful in your future interactions, in situations involving others, like amateur radio, journalism, and politics. [ß Politics?]
+ Again, these are just my observations; take them or leave them; this is not an attack, and; this is meant to be helpful, not hurtful. [ß We know already, Brian! But, ’me thinks thou doth protest much too much’….]
+ You entered this thread in attack mode. [ß Huhh?] You have a history of this behavior. [ß You mean like your 1,000+ event history, on this page alone?] When people rebut your (often) hostile, inaccurate, and/or distorted observations, you (often) get defensive, and you start whining. [ß You mean like you’re doing now?]
+ Many of your unkind words [ß OK…. How do Ed’s “unkind words” compare to your FRAUDulent ones, Brian?] here have been re-printed on at least one web page, one of which is infamous for delusional libel. [ß How does that “one” compare to your dozen+ psychotic ones, Brian?] "Delusional" in this case, is expressed in classical terms, meaning, divorced from reality. "Libel" is defined as harmful writing, of fraudulent provenance, having no basis in fact. [ß I taught I taw a putty tat, Laura.]
+ Most people naturally resent unkind, libelous, inaccurate words which appear to be archived on the net 'forever.' [ß We finally agree on something! Been looking in the mirror again, Brian? BTW I don’t have an “Archive”, but understand that you do….]
+ When challenged, and asked to remove your comments [ß You mean like Bogdan W4EEH above?], you've referred to their challenges as "threats" and have even made comments about "getting the police involved," which is not only naive, it's kind of silly, isn't it? [ß Admit it, Brian: It’s only “silly” if it’s even contemplated against you….]
+ You've called other people liars, frauds, snitches, lunatics, hypocrites, and band cops, and you've publicly accused them of breaking federal law. These comments are all archived on the internet, yet, you portray yourself as a victim. [ß Surprise, surprise, Brian, because as this page amply proves, you made him so….]
+ You associated yourself with a well known Canadian by engaging him on the air [ß Wow, Ed: Guilt by distant association. Report to GITMO!], and by joining his Yahoo group [ß NOT “his”, Brian. Also, recall that 2+ years ago you had him banned by the yahoos on Yahoo!], the purpose of which, was solely to defame others. [ß Brian now presumes to know others’ SOLE motive! The Hubris! Or, was he simply looking in the mirror?]
The group violated Yahoo terms of service, and it was taken down. [ß Bravo, again, Brian!] Yet, to this day, I've never seen you take responsibility for your actions. I've never seen any indication from you that your actions may have been ill-advised. [ß Mirror, mirror, wherefore art thou, mirror?]
+ You've characterized people who've merely commented on information you've discussed publicly as having 'attacked' you somehow. Comments about things you introduce into public debate are not attacks, they're simply observations based in fact. [ß No Brian. Admit it, most of your comments are “Faith Based”.]
+ You appeared out of the blue, as a very inexperienced amateur, but you acted as though you had "all the answers." You still often act as though you have all the answers. Unfortunately, your conclusions are often inaccurate, your accusations wrong, and many of your words, hurtful. [ßCry me a river, Brian. Even if true, for the sake of argument only, at least they’re not FRAUDulent, like most of your writings!] As a rule, people react negatively to these behaviors. Can you honestly blame them?
+ You were banned briefly, and you took a break, but you came back, apparently, with the same attitudes and behaviors. [ß Brian, maybe if you had bought Ed some knee pads, like you supplied to your toadies ID’d earlier, he’d have ‘adopted a different attitude’, HI….]
This is not the only site where people have tried to gently point out some of these problematic behaviors. Both Paul [N1LAF] and Ryan [N2RJ], and others, have tried to help you, gently, but firmly, much as I'm attempting to do now. [ß Brian likes to ‘slip it in’ gently but firmly, HI….]
+ Many of the comments posted by you, reside on a web page, right next to other harmful comments [ß Is this more of your ‘guilt by association’ Psycho?], which were invented by a person, or persons, who entered qrz, and other forums, under false pretenses, using false names, making false claims. [ß Brian, you sure seem to know a lot about ‘falseness’….]
+ On investigation, these harmful comments were removed by responsible moderators [ß You mean by Terry GRAVES K7FE your FRAUDulent ‘QeerZ’ mole? BTW Is Terry any relation to Matthew ‘Pulitzer Putz’ GRAVES KB3FQN of CMSPIRG/SARC infamy?]. Yet, they still exist on a page hosted by an associate of yours [ß The “Canadian Army of One”, by definition, has no associates, Dimmi.] right next to your comments, as some sort of phony testament for the woefully naive. The page where your comments are archived is inherently and demonstrably deceptive, libelous, and harmful. [ß But unlike yours, Brian, which is un-attributed, anonymous, cloaked and FRAUDulent--the other webpage/’other hand clapping’ is overt, signed, and even © so, your point is, Psycho?]
+ I know the comments are yours, because you posted them here first, then they were removed. Next, they were copied, and posted on a distant server, where they still exist, today. [ß Huhh? First they were posted. Then they were removed. Next, they were copied and posted? Obviously, Brian’s sucking Riley’s cock for years has been deleterious to his reasoning ability/mental health.]
+ I think a person genuinely interested in 'peace' would contact the owner(s) of those blogs and pages and have those comments removed. [ß Neville CHAMBERLAIN, much more modestly, was only interested in “peace in our time” and look what it wrought….]
+ The mere association of your name, and your inaccurate, harmful comments, alongside comments posted under fraudulent pretenses, doesn't look good for your credibility, honesty and probity, all of which are a litmus test for public office (where honest politicians are concerned). [ß Ed, if English were not the 4th language I learned, I would swear that this was a threat/attempt at ~blackmail.]
+ The fact is, your association with this person or persons creates an appearance of impropriety. [ß Is that anything like your ‘snitching’ association with the quasi-Criminal regime at the FCC under Riley’s tenure?] I believe a wise man, with a desire to enter a career in politics, would attend to this immediately. [ß Ed, just in case you missed it, this again is a thinly veiled threat/attempt at extortion!]
+ The page where your comments are posted, is shared [ß Wrong, Brian. Presenting opinion as fact, as is your usual, is actionable, Psycho.] between a Canadian amateur and an amateur in Michigan (banned here and elsewhere) who falsely reported 7 amateurs to child protective services for "child pandering." The fact that your comments are posted in association with the other comments I mentioned, doesn't engender respect for you. Quite the contrary. [ß What is the penalty in PA for swearing a False Affidavit, Brian?]
+ The Michigan amateur spends much of his time flooding usenet groups with thousands of delusional comments, preventing others from using the usenet service. [ß But, does he block your IPN like you routinely do to others, Psycho?]
+ Like it or not, your documented association, cooperation, and participation in groups with people like this, affects how others perceive you. [ß Mirror for Brian please!]
+ Four of your associates from the Yahoo group are banned from several sites. [ß Yawn….] One used another person's callsign illegally, for years, another broke into qrz under false pretenses, stealing an elderly hams callsign to post defamation [ß Is that anything like what you did to Pan Benjamin BIALY W9TKJ an ill octogenarian from IL when you used his name, his call-sign and made-up FRAUDulent e-mail using his call-sign (which someone additionally inserted in his QRZ call-sign DB), despite Benjamin NEVER having had a computer in his life, all in order to try to snooker me?], another is... well, I don't really thing [sic] you want to be associated with ANY of them.
+ It might be time to consider past actions, and words written in haste, and to try to reconcile with people you've offended and harmed. We all need to practice tempering our words in the future; thinking before we hit the send key. Why not ask these people to remove your harmful words from the internet; bury the hatchet, and move on?
Having said all this, I take complete responsibility for my actions [ß Yeahh, right!]. If I've offended you, in any way, I apologize, now, and for any of my past comments, which were wholly made in reaction to the behaviors noted above. [ß Sad, really. Brian does NOT even know what constitutes an unequivocal apology.]
Brian
Brian K3VR peeking from under his ‘Mask of Sanity’, for “Laura L. Smith Successor to RH” on QRZ.com 1 Feb ‘09
Monday, June 21, 2010
Don't get involved in any on-air disputes [ß Does this apply to your “Mafia” as well, Brian?] and by all means DON'T jam anyone [ß But, but… what about your repeated incitement to jam, above, Brian?], or engage in music playing, or any of that garbage. [ß BTW Are NAZI marches and Hitler’s speeches and God Bless HAMereeka by way of malicious QRM, as rebroadcast by your toadies, OK?]
Another thing; if you make complaints to the FCC, beware that one "new tactic" involves bad guys [ß Bad guys? I thought that they were all “terrorists”!] filing an FOIA so the info they receive on your complaints can be forwarded out of the country, where you will be defamed, in print, on a server, outside U.S. jurisdiction. [ß Not yet, Brian, but, ‘wait for it’….]
Your name will be dragged through the mud on the net, and on the air, outside U.S. jurisdiction [ß Is that in any way analogous to what you do on your CMSPIRG ~outside CDN jurisdiction?], and false complaints of child abuse will be filed against you [ß Don’t know about that, Brian, but how does it compare to YOU swearing a False Affidavit?]. It's already happened to 7 men in 7 different states. So, don't get involved at all unless you have very thick skin. [ß And have real estate registered in your name (“PMI” and ‘upside down’ mortgages don’t count).]
Brian ‘Inconsistent CROW’ K3VR trying to snooker “Laura L. Smith Successor to RH” on QRZ.com 1 Feb ‘09
The purpose of this site is to inform the public [ß Duhh, where have I seen this formulary used before?] about Mark C Morgan ~KB9RQZ also known as the "Usenet moron" because he has for several years been spamming Usenet groups with thousands of innocuous posts, rendering the groups useless, presumably for his own perverse pleasure. [ß Look up the meaning of “innocuous”, Dimmi. BTW Nice ‘mimic job’ on the last bit especially. Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery!]
Brian ‘Dimmi Mimic’ CROW K3VR’s new Blog in http://sites.google.com/site/kb9rqzproject/Home 4 Feb ‘09
Another thing; if you make complaints to the FCC, beware that one "new tactic" involves bad guys [ß Bad guys? I thought that they were all “terrorists”!] filing an FOIA so the info they receive on your complaints can be forwarded out of the country, where you will be defamed, in print, on a server, outside U.S. jurisdiction. [ß Not yet, Brian, but, ‘wait for it’….]
Your name will be dragged through the mud on the net, and on the air, outside U.S. jurisdiction [ß Is that in any way analogous to what you do on your CMSPIRG ~outside CDN jurisdiction?], and false complaints of child abuse will be filed against you [ß Don’t know about that, Brian, but how does it compare to YOU swearing a False Affidavit?]. It's already happened to 7 men in 7 different states. So, don't get involved at all unless you have very thick skin. [ß And have real estate registered in your name (“PMI” and ‘upside down’ mortgages don’t count).]
Brian ‘Inconsistent CROW’ K3VR trying to snooker “Laura L. Smith Successor to RH” on QRZ.com 1 Feb ‘09
The purpose of this site is to inform the public [ß Duhh, where have I seen this formulary used before?] about Mark C Morgan ~KB9RQZ also known as the "Usenet moron" because he has for several years been spamming Usenet groups with thousands of innocuous posts, rendering the groups useless, presumably for his own perverse pleasure. [ß Look up the meaning of “innocuous”, Dimmi. BTW Nice ‘mimic job’ on the last bit especially. Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery!]
Brian ‘Dimmi Mimic’ CROW K3VR’s new Blog in http://sites.google.com/site/kb9rqzproject/Home 4 Feb ‘09
Sunday, June 20, 2010
Saturday, June 19, 2010
CANADA [and non]. KAROL MADERA, VE7KFM - NO PROTECTION UNDER US LAW
A spokesperson for the US government has confirmed that foreign amateur radio stations engaged in threats, obscenity, profanity, indecency, and/or jamming and deliberate interference, have no protection afforded them under US law.
CMSPIRG has learned that when VE7KFM transmits, he invariably engages in one or more of the above activities, therefore, no action will be taken against US licensees who talk over, or who otherwise interfere with VE7KFM's transmissions, provided such transmissions are otherwise legal and properly identified.
VE7KFM is not subject to US rules -- however, neither are VE7KFM's transmissions protected in the United States. The government source went on to say "We wouldn't take action against US licensees anyway, since we've discovered that Karol Madera is neither a credible witness, nor a credible victim."
See http://www.suckK3VRoff.com for further details (Brian Crow, PA, Jan 10, DX LISTENING DIGEST)
Brian ‘I Suck Riley’s & Glenn’s Cocks’ CROW K3VR in DX LD #7-005 10 Jan ’07 [but see latest, next]
A spokesperson for the US government has confirmed that foreign amateur radio stations engaged in threats, obscenity, profanity, indecency, and/or jamming and deliberate interference, have no protection afforded them under US law.
CMSPIRG has learned that when VE7KFM transmits, he invariably engages in one or more of the above activities, therefore, no action will be taken against US licensees who talk over, or who otherwise interfere with VE7KFM's transmissions, provided such transmissions are otherwise legal and properly identified.
VE7KFM is not subject to US rules -- however, neither are VE7KFM's transmissions protected in the United States. The government source went on to say "We wouldn't take action against US licensees anyway, since we've discovered that Karol Madera is neither a credible witness, nor a credible victim."
See http://www.suckK3VRoff.com for further details (Brian Crow, PA, Jan 10, DX LISTENING DIGEST)
Brian ‘I Suck Riley’s & Glenn’s Cocks’ CROW K3VR in DX LD #7-005 10 Jan ’07 [but see latest, next]
Randy -- I don't particularly like what Karol says on the air -- but that does not mean that you (or anyone else) has the right to try to drive him off…. and to tell you the truth, even if I did have jurisdiction over Karol (which I DO NOT) nothing that I have heard thus far rises to the level of an actionable complaint….
Indeed, were Karol an American, his speech would fall squarely under the 1st Amendment -- you know that thing many of our forefathers fought and died for (not to mention our troops overseas right now). When you call yourself patriotic, built within that statement is the acceptance of the Constitution and all it entails -- free speech is one of the cornerstones of that fine document. It doesn't mean only the speech YOU agree with; or only the speech that the majority of folks agree with; or even only speech that isn't offensive to most mature, rational adults. It means ALL speech -- the good, the bad, and yes, even the ugly (as Karol is quite often wont to spout)….
What is within the confines of the rules, however is that fact that I can (AND WILL) enforce the rules against any Americans who cause harmful interference to Karol (and any of the folks who elect to engage him in QSOs). Let me repeat that so everyone understands it -- RETALIATORY JAMMING WILL NOT BE TOLERATED AND IS IN VIOLATION OF THE RULES!
I hope you all got my message here -- I have just about had it with the juvenile antics on the part of the American licensees. By the way, playing bulletins and tapes of a deceased licensee repeatedly in an effort to tie up the frequency so that Karol (and others) cannot use it actually does rise to the level of malicious interference -- and is subject to a possible enforcement action. Likewise, I won't even go into the ridiculous sound effects, endless playing of music, and general pre-pubescent behavior that quite a number of folks engage in on a daily basis at 14.275 -- again, all in an attempt to prevent Karol from engaging in QSOs. It needs to stop and needs to stop right now!
Gravamen of Laura L. SMITH a.k.a. “SCARE” e-mail [Bravo!] to Randy ‘Racist’ BEST W7CPA ~3 Mar ‘09
Indeed, were Karol an American, his speech would fall squarely under the 1st Amendment -- you know that thing many of our forefathers fought and died for (not to mention our troops overseas right now). When you call yourself patriotic, built within that statement is the acceptance of the Constitution and all it entails -- free speech is one of the cornerstones of that fine document. It doesn't mean only the speech YOU agree with; or only the speech that the majority of folks agree with; or even only speech that isn't offensive to most mature, rational adults. It means ALL speech -- the good, the bad, and yes, even the ugly (as Karol is quite often wont to spout)….
What is within the confines of the rules, however is that fact that I can (AND WILL) enforce the rules against any Americans who cause harmful interference to Karol (and any of the folks who elect to engage him in QSOs). Let me repeat that so everyone understands it -- RETALIATORY JAMMING WILL NOT BE TOLERATED AND IS IN VIOLATION OF THE RULES!
I hope you all got my message here -- I have just about had it with the juvenile antics on the part of the American licensees. By the way, playing bulletins and tapes of a deceased licensee repeatedly in an effort to tie up the frequency so that Karol (and others) cannot use it actually does rise to the level of malicious interference -- and is subject to a possible enforcement action. Likewise, I won't even go into the ridiculous sound effects, endless playing of music, and general pre-pubescent behavior that quite a number of folks engage in on a daily basis at 14.275 -- again, all in an attempt to prevent Karol from engaging in QSOs. It needs to stop and needs to stop right now!
Gravamen of Laura L. SMITH a.k.a. “SCARE” e-mail [Bravo!] to Randy ‘Racist’ BEST W7CPA ~3 Mar ‘09
Thursday, June 17, 2010
Mark -- I don't particularly like what Karol says on the air -- but that does not mean that you (or anyone else) has the right to try to suck him off on the air…. and to tell you the truth, even if I did have jurisdiction over Karol (which I DO NOT) nothing that I have heard thus far indicates Karol is heterosexual….
Indeed, were Karol an American, his speech would fall squarely under the 1st Amendment -- you know that thing many of our forefathers fought and died for (not to mention our troops overseas right now). When you call yourself patriotic, built within that statement is the acceptance of the Constitution and all it entails -- free speech is one of the cornerstones of that fine document. It doesn't mean only the speech YOU agree with; or only the speech that the majority of folks agree with; or even only speech that isn't offensive to most mature, rational adults. It means ALL speech -- the good, the bad, and yes, even the ugly (as Karol is quite often wont to spout). So when Karol asks men to suck him off that's ok with me. And if Karol is gayer than a 3 dollar bill, that's ok too. It's obvious he's a cocksucker, isn't it? ….
He's just a gayboy, ok?….
I have requested that Karol tone down his campy transexual "act" on the air…. He is going to continue the tranny "act" and he's probably going to wear a pink boa and pick up quarters off the bar with his vagina -- and you guys thus far have demonstrated that you are going to continue falling into his trap. Why not just send him $100 and tell him to take his act to the Green Light Lounge?
A Canadian cocksucker's getting your panties twisted. What does that say about the cognitive abilities of the Americans as they are all being led around by a masturbating manipulator.
What is within the confines of the rules, however is that fact that I can (AND WILL) enforce the rules against any Americans who cause harmful interference to those who qrm Karol (and I'll fine any of the folks who elect to engage him in QSOs). Let me repeat that so everyone understands it -- RETALIATORY JAMMING WILL NOT BE TOLERATED AND IS IN VIOLATION OF THE RULES! AND IF I POST THIS IS IN ALL CAPS YOU MAY NOT REALIZE I'M A BLUFFING BULLSHITTER, JUST LIKE RILEY HOLLINGSWORTH, ESQUIRE.
I hope you all got my message here -- I have just about had it with the juvenile antics on the part of the American licensees. Stop the fag bashing! By the way, playing bulletins and tapes of a deceased licensee repeatedly in an effort to tie up the frequency so that Karol (and others) cannot use it actually doesn't rise to the level of malicious interference -- and is not subject to a possible enforcement action. Keep up the good work! Likewise, I won't even go into the ridiculous sound effects, endless playing of music, and general pre-pubescent behavior that quite a number of folks engage in on a daily basis at 14.275 -- again, all in an attempt to prevent Karol from engaging in QSOs. Excellent job! It needs to continue and I mean right now!
Can you tell I'm pissed? I just got my period and I'm wearing a white pants suit! If you haven't yet figured it out let me clue you in here -- My Prozac prescription expired 5 days ago! This behavior either stops now or everyone involved with Karol will find themselves on the receiving end of enforcement letters. I use pink stationery just like Todd's blog, which is an absolute disgrace -- I know kindergarteners that have shown a higher degree of maturity than the whole bunch of you prancing ponies!
Laura "on too much caffeine" at the Gettysburg Bath House
Elements of Brian ‘Hyper Homo-Sexual’ CROW K3VR ‘spoof’ [Bravo!] of Laura’s leaked e-mail 3 Mar ‘09
Indeed, were Karol an American, his speech would fall squarely under the 1st Amendment -- you know that thing many of our forefathers fought and died for (not to mention our troops overseas right now). When you call yourself patriotic, built within that statement is the acceptance of the Constitution and all it entails -- free speech is one of the cornerstones of that fine document. It doesn't mean only the speech YOU agree with; or only the speech that the majority of folks agree with; or even only speech that isn't offensive to most mature, rational adults. It means ALL speech -- the good, the bad, and yes, even the ugly (as Karol is quite often wont to spout). So when Karol asks men to suck him off that's ok with me. And if Karol is gayer than a 3 dollar bill, that's ok too. It's obvious he's a cocksucker, isn't it? ….
He's just a gayboy, ok?….
I have requested that Karol tone down his campy transexual "act" on the air…. He is going to continue the tranny "act" and he's probably going to wear a pink boa and pick up quarters off the bar with his vagina -- and you guys thus far have demonstrated that you are going to continue falling into his trap. Why not just send him $100 and tell him to take his act to the Green Light Lounge?
A Canadian cocksucker's getting your panties twisted. What does that say about the cognitive abilities of the Americans as they are all being led around by a masturbating manipulator.
What is within the confines of the rules, however is that fact that I can (AND WILL) enforce the rules against any Americans who cause harmful interference to those who qrm Karol (and I'll fine any of the folks who elect to engage him in QSOs). Let me repeat that so everyone understands it -- RETALIATORY JAMMING WILL NOT BE TOLERATED AND IS IN VIOLATION OF THE RULES! AND IF I POST THIS IS IN ALL CAPS YOU MAY NOT REALIZE I'M A BLUFFING BULLSHITTER, JUST LIKE RILEY HOLLINGSWORTH, ESQUIRE.
I hope you all got my message here -- I have just about had it with the juvenile antics on the part of the American licensees. Stop the fag bashing! By the way, playing bulletins and tapes of a deceased licensee repeatedly in an effort to tie up the frequency so that Karol (and others) cannot use it actually doesn't rise to the level of malicious interference -- and is not subject to a possible enforcement action. Keep up the good work! Likewise, I won't even go into the ridiculous sound effects, endless playing of music, and general pre-pubescent behavior that quite a number of folks engage in on a daily basis at 14.275 -- again, all in an attempt to prevent Karol from engaging in QSOs. Excellent job! It needs to continue and I mean right now!
Can you tell I'm pissed? I just got my period and I'm wearing a white pants suit! If you haven't yet figured it out let me clue you in here -- My Prozac prescription expired 5 days ago! This behavior either stops now or everyone involved with Karol will find themselves on the receiving end of enforcement letters. I use pink stationery just like Todd's blog, which is an absolute disgrace -- I know kindergarteners that have shown a higher degree of maturity than the whole bunch of you prancing ponies!
Laura "on too much caffeine" at the Gettysburg Bath House
Elements of Brian ‘Hyper Homo-Sexual’ CROW K3VR ‘spoof’ [Bravo!] of Laura’s leaked e-mail 3 Mar ‘09
Tuesday, June 15, 2010
BREAKING NEWS:
14275 Saga Provokes 1,000 Word Email Rant by New FCC Enforceress
Referring to Karol Madera's speech [ß That’s Karol VE7KFM to you, Puke!], she offered her opinion, telling the licensees that the FCC regulates obscenity [the categories of which were here pointedly republished by Psycho for maximum negative effect]… would be protected speech in the US…. [ß Surprise, surprise!]
As for the numerous unknown individuals in violation of part 97…. [ß Bravo for ACK the obvious, Psycho, but you’re too obtuse by far!]
She continued in the same vein, throughout 7 paragraphs of excited rhetoric. [ß The “excited” is highly subjective, especially coming from someone who routinely uses hyper homo-sexual speech and wallows in coprophilia, Sicko!] Ms. Smith unloaded her apparent exasperation on two licensees, who were not necessarily the target of her obvious frustration…. [ß Huhh? There is only one licencee mentioned: your LYING co-conspirator Randy BEST W7CPA. So, who is the other and why the mention w/o any evidence? Also, are you again trying to read minds/intentions, Laura’s ~Standard if admittedly highly inconvenient English notwithstanding?]
Although she was only addressing two licensees, and we stress that neither licensee is the subject of current enforcement activity…. [ß Ditto, immediately above. We know already, Psycho! But why the “stress”? Are you under stress?]
We wish Laura Smith luck in her quest to track down and write letters to the hundreds of anonymous Americans (?) who have responded to, and who continue to respond to Karol Madera's America-bashing. [ß Bravo, on the sarcasm, Psycho!]
However, Ms. Smith's good intentions notwithstanding [ß Don’t imitate my diction, Dimmi.], we fear that the lack of resources for amateur radio enforcement, the bureaucratic ineffectiveness of the FCC in general, the ingenuity of those jamming Madera's transmissions [ß Tell Laura more, Brian.], and the sheer number of those engaged in civil disobedience [ß You’re the disobedient and Criminal SOB leading the “sheer number”!], will be a source of continued frustration for Ms. Smith. [ß If I’m not mistaken, all this is a challenge to Laura. GL in the KKKontest, Psycho!]
Brian’s 1st FRAUDulent Commentary on Laura’s Broadside in his www.suckK3VRoff.com 4 Mar ‘09
14275 Saga Provokes 1,000 Word Email Rant by New FCC Enforceress
Referring to Karol Madera's speech [ß That’s Karol VE7KFM to you, Puke!], she offered her opinion, telling the licensees that the FCC regulates obscenity [the categories of which were here pointedly republished by Psycho for maximum negative effect]… would be protected speech in the US…. [ß Surprise, surprise!]
As for the numerous unknown individuals in violation of part 97…. [ß Bravo for ACK the obvious, Psycho, but you’re too obtuse by far!]
She continued in the same vein, throughout 7 paragraphs of excited rhetoric. [ß The “excited” is highly subjective, especially coming from someone who routinely uses hyper homo-sexual speech and wallows in coprophilia, Sicko!] Ms. Smith unloaded her apparent exasperation on two licensees, who were not necessarily the target of her obvious frustration…. [ß Huhh? There is only one licencee mentioned: your LYING co-conspirator Randy BEST W7CPA. So, who is the other and why the mention w/o any evidence? Also, are you again trying to read minds/intentions, Laura’s ~Standard if admittedly highly inconvenient English notwithstanding?]
Although she was only addressing two licensees, and we stress that neither licensee is the subject of current enforcement activity…. [ß Ditto, immediately above. We know already, Psycho! But why the “stress”? Are you under stress?]
We wish Laura Smith luck in her quest to track down and write letters to the hundreds of anonymous Americans (?) who have responded to, and who continue to respond to Karol Madera's America-bashing. [ß Bravo, on the sarcasm, Psycho!]
However, Ms. Smith's good intentions notwithstanding [ß Don’t imitate my diction, Dimmi.], we fear that the lack of resources for amateur radio enforcement, the bureaucratic ineffectiveness of the FCC in general, the ingenuity of those jamming Madera's transmissions [ß Tell Laura more, Brian.], and the sheer number of those engaged in civil disobedience [ß You’re the disobedient and Criminal SOB leading the “sheer number”!], will be a source of continued frustration for Ms. Smith. [ß If I’m not mistaken, all this is a challenge to Laura. GL in the KKKontest, Psycho!]
Brian’s 1st FRAUDulent Commentary on Laura’s Broadside in his www.suckK3VRoff.com 4 Mar ‘09
Monday, June 14, 2010
Sunday, June 13, 2010
BREAKING NEWS: [ß Compare/contrast this with the previous one, above.]
Since the email has been widely republished; and posted on at least three websites, and; it was apparently delivered via government email servers; written concerning public FCC business; appearing with Laura Smith's official FCC signature line; including the FCC email address, phone number, and fax number; the email is now firmly in the public domain…. [ß SOP. Modesty does NOT become you, Brian. Laura’s e-mail was initially leaked to and originally published and then re-published on the WWW by none other than YOU, Psycho!]
It's a lengthy email, at 1,000 words and seven paragraphs, and it outlines 'Ms. Smith's' views in colorful language, which may offend some readers. [ß But it’s not nearly as colourful/offensive as yours, here…. BTW How is your dog, “Tor”?]
She continued in the same vein, throughout 7 paragraphs of excited rhetoric. Ms. Smith unloaded her apparent exasperation on two licensees, who were not the target of her obvious frustration [ß We know already, Brian. No need to underline.]. Apparently, her targets were Karol Madera [ß Did I ever tell you that Brian’s brain is wired 180 degrees out of phase?], and, "the whole bunch of you," whosoever that may be. Her main point was emphasized by the use of all caps, generally regarded as the e-version of shouting…. [ß But thankfully not yet screaming, HI. Beware the woman screaming, Psycho….]
We wish Laura Smith luck in her quest to track down and write enforcement letters to the hundreds of anonymous Americans (?) who have responded to, and who continue to respond to, Karol Madera's America-bashing and affiliation with al Qaeda…. [ß Just call me “Al Qaeda Northern Command” for short.]
We have received numerous comments (some frankly unprintable) [ß You’re much too modest, Sicko!] regarding what 9 out of 10 readers are calling "a complete lack of professionalism" and worse. [ß The “9 out of 10” was Psycho Brian erroneously counting Mrs. Palmer’s pinkies, while engaging in an “excited” circle jerk, with himself.] We decline to publish personal attacks against Ms. Smith. [ß Of course, Brian. Your comments here are a Testament to your exemplary decorum.] Ms. Smith has an opportunity to comment further, through our information portal, or through official FCC channels, should she wish to do so. [ß Huhh?]
Some of our readers have stated their intention to send the email to Dr. Kent Nilsson, FCC Inspector General [ß GL. Congress 3 months ago stated: “Serious allegations against Dr. Nilsson are pending before PCIE”.], and to Kris Monteith, Chief of the FCC Enforcement Bureau [ß Whom Bill W6WBJ only a month ago accused of Misleading Justice], and others, including their Congressional Representatives [ß I recommend contacting the authors of the Congressional Report “DECEPTION AND DISTRUST: THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION UNDER KEVIN J. MARTIN”], asking if Ms. Smith's hire truly represents the best interests of the people of the United States. [ß Truly, I don’t know, not being a HAMereekan…. But her action against your Randy ‘Racist’ BEST W7CPA w/o question was in the best interest of the ITU/World.]
Others wrote to ask whether she was completely and properly vetted for the job [ß Psycho, YOU spoke with and subsequently “vetted” her on your QeerZ, remember?]; why the FCC hired someone with no experience in amateur radio matters [ß Precisely so YOU could not suck her off, as you did your Riley, remember?]; and if her hiring (at $200,000 ++) including salary and benefits, is really an appropriate use of taxpayer money, at a time of fiscal crisis. [ß Fuck your ‘Jewish Engineered’ Wall Street Crisis! If Laura pulls your licence, as she should—and/or arranges ‘room & board’ for you and your Criminal co-conspirators—her salary for at least one year will be more than offset by FRAUDulently instigated investigations NOT undertaken by your incompetent ‘alphabet soup’ thugs and ours.]
For our part, Ms. Smith's good intentions notwithstanding, we fear that the lack of resources for amateur radio enforcement, what the GAO called the "bureaucratic ineffectiveness" of the FCC in general, the ingenuity of those jamming Madera's transmissions, and the sheer number of those engaged in civil disobedience, will be a source of continued frustration for Ms. Smith.
Brian’s 2nd seriously FRAUDulent Commentary, ratcheting up the ugliness, on his website 5 Mar ‘09
Since the email has been widely republished; and posted on at least three websites, and; it was apparently delivered via government email servers; written concerning public FCC business; appearing with Laura Smith's official FCC signature line; including the FCC email address, phone number, and fax number; the email is now firmly in the public domain…. [ß SOP. Modesty does NOT become you, Brian. Laura’s e-mail was initially leaked to and originally published and then re-published on the WWW by none other than YOU, Psycho!]
It's a lengthy email, at 1,000 words and seven paragraphs, and it outlines 'Ms. Smith's' views in colorful language, which may offend some readers. [ß But it’s not nearly as colourful/offensive as yours, here…. BTW How is your dog, “Tor”?]
She continued in the same vein, throughout 7 paragraphs of excited rhetoric. Ms. Smith unloaded her apparent exasperation on two licensees, who were not the target of her obvious frustration [ß We know already, Brian. No need to underline.]. Apparently, her targets were Karol Madera [ß Did I ever tell you that Brian’s brain is wired 180 degrees out of phase?], and, "the whole bunch of you," whosoever that may be. Her main point was emphasized by the use of all caps, generally regarded as the e-version of shouting…. [ß But thankfully not yet screaming, HI. Beware the woman screaming, Psycho….]
We wish Laura Smith luck in her quest to track down and write enforcement letters to the hundreds of anonymous Americans (?) who have responded to, and who continue to respond to, Karol Madera's America-bashing and affiliation with al Qaeda…. [ß Just call me “Al Qaeda Northern Command” for short.]
We have received numerous comments (some frankly unprintable) [ß You’re much too modest, Sicko!] regarding what 9 out of 10 readers are calling "a complete lack of professionalism" and worse. [ß The “9 out of 10” was Psycho Brian erroneously counting Mrs. Palmer’s pinkies, while engaging in an “excited” circle jerk, with himself.] We decline to publish personal attacks against Ms. Smith. [ß Of course, Brian. Your comments here are a Testament to your exemplary decorum.] Ms. Smith has an opportunity to comment further, through our information portal, or through official FCC channels, should she wish to do so. [ß Huhh?]
Some of our readers have stated their intention to send the email to Dr. Kent Nilsson, FCC Inspector General [ß GL. Congress 3 months ago stated: “Serious allegations against Dr. Nilsson are pending before PCIE”.], and to Kris Monteith, Chief of the FCC Enforcement Bureau [ß Whom Bill W6WBJ only a month ago accused of Misleading Justice], and others, including their Congressional Representatives [ß I recommend contacting the authors of the Congressional Report “DECEPTION AND DISTRUST: THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION UNDER KEVIN J. MARTIN”], asking if Ms. Smith's hire truly represents the best interests of the people of the United States. [ß Truly, I don’t know, not being a HAMereekan…. But her action against your Randy ‘Racist’ BEST W7CPA w/o question was in the best interest of the ITU/World.]
Others wrote to ask whether she was completely and properly vetted for the job [ß Psycho, YOU spoke with and subsequently “vetted” her on your QeerZ, remember?]; why the FCC hired someone with no experience in amateur radio matters [ß Precisely so YOU could not suck her off, as you did your Riley, remember?]; and if her hiring (at $200,000 ++) including salary and benefits, is really an appropriate use of taxpayer money, at a time of fiscal crisis. [ß Fuck your ‘Jewish Engineered’ Wall Street Crisis! If Laura pulls your licence, as she should—and/or arranges ‘room & board’ for you and your Criminal co-conspirators—her salary for at least one year will be more than offset by FRAUDulently instigated investigations NOT undertaken by your incompetent ‘alphabet soup’ thugs and ours.]
For our part, Ms. Smith's good intentions notwithstanding, we fear that the lack of resources for amateur radio enforcement, what the GAO called the "bureaucratic ineffectiveness" of the FCC in general, the ingenuity of those jamming Madera's transmissions, and the sheer number of those engaged in civil disobedience, will be a source of continued frustration for Ms. Smith.
Brian’s 2nd seriously FRAUDulent Commentary, ratcheting up the ugliness, on his website 5 Mar ‘09
Saturday, June 12, 2010
Friday, June 11, 2010
Laura L. Smith, FCC Enforcement Bureau [ß Published as a parody of her Bio.]
In early 2009, Laura Smith… took over Riley Hollingsworth's position at the FCC.
One positive development is an email written by Ms. Smith… stating her belief that the FCC has no intention of regulating the Internet. This is good news for FCC licensees who may have feared they would be penalized for speaking frankly on the Internet. [ß This should be “good news” especially—but pro tem only—to Brian CROW K3VR whose ~anonymous specialty on the WWW is Criminal Libel/Defamation.]
In one such case, the email referenced above was immediately seized upon by William F. Crowell, W6WBJ. According to a motion by Crowell, the FCC has apparently stated their intention to examine his "character" based on the content of his Internet postings, which is something Crowell has objected to. [ß As might you, Psycho, otherwise, you’re not only going to lose your licence, but arguably will land in Jail.] His motion, is apparently an attempt to use Ms. Smith’s email as prima facie evidence that the FCC does not regulate the content of Internet posts. [ß Psycho Brian would now dictate, to an Attorney, in his own case, whether and how he can ‘seize good news’. Has Brian’s HAMereekan Hubris no bounds?]
Ms. Smith came under fire in February and March, regarding what some called her 'shoot from both hips' approach to enforcement….
Madera is often jammed by unidentified stations [ß Incited by Psycho Brian, in his own words, as this page amply evidences.] who play music and noise effects in order to drown out his transmissions. There is no proof that any station Madera has ever named has taken part in the jamming…. [ß How does Brian know this? Ohh, never mind, I know: he’s Psychotic!]
In March, a potentially embarassing [ß sic] email, written by Ms. Smith, was sent to two FCC licensees, concerning official Commission business. [ß Nothing wrong with/embarrassing about that, even if exactly true.] The email quickly surfaced on the Internet, at blogs operated by Mark Morgan and Todd Daugherty. [ß Plenty wrong with that, especially if the e-mail was leaked by Randy ‘Racist’ BEST W7CPA, as is most likely and was 1st “surfaced” on the WWW by you, Psycho.] Online repartee referred to Ms. Smith's communication as a "1,000 word rant" that one reader described as “PMS on Steroids.” [ß That “repartee”, “rant” and PMS slur were not only YOURS but were and are on YOUR FRAUDulent website where the current subject piece of shit also resides, Psycho!]
According to our tips line [ß Is that anything like the 1-800-264-5980 number you FRAUDulently put up as part of your “International” Distress & FALSE SOS capers in mid-2008 ?], complaints were made to the FCC hierarchy regarding Ms. Smith's email, which has been termed "horrifying" and "abusive" by one present, and one former FCC employee, who both asked to remain anonymous. [ß Sure it was, if you/Riley say so. But, who is your mole at the FCC, Psycho?]
Conversations we have monitored on-air, have referred to the email as 'The Laura Doctrine' and many are hailing it as "a victory for free speech." Her remark about Karol Madera's diatribes, "Nothing I have heard thus far rises to the level of an actionable complaint" is now being interpreted as "anything goes" where speech over amateur radio is concerned…. [ß If you have the balls, Brian, which I doubt, put your silly interpretation to the test. GL in the KKKontest!]
In fact… according to Ms. Smith, although Madera's speech is "obnoxious," … it "does not necessarily rise to the level of obscene speech."….
Laura Smith, who has visited this website, and heard our audio recordings, had this to say about Mr. Madera:
"Indeed, were Karol an American, his speech would fall squarely under the 1st Amendment -- you know that thing many of our forefathers fought and died for (not to mention our troops overseas right now). When you call yourself patriotic, built within that statement is the acceptance of the Constitution and all it entails -- free speech is one of the cornerstones of that fine document. It doesn't mean only the speech YOU agree with; or only the speech that the majority of folks agree with; or even only speech that isn't offensive to most mature, rational adults. It means ALL speech -- the good, the bad, and yes, even the ugly (as Karol is quite often want [SIC] to spout)…. [ß If you’re going to shamelessly imitate me, at least do it correctly, sic and w/o e-shouting, Dimmi.]
We agree that 1st Amendment issues should be carefully guarded, indeed they should be sacrosanct…. [ß Is that your Royal “We” and what part of “sacrosanct” don’t you understand, Fucktard?] Ms. Smith's email has left us all shaking our heads and wondering. [ß You and Riley shaking your ‘little heads’ in this contrived ‘circle jerk’, ogled by Kris the ‘voyeuress’, does not count.] We wonder too if Julius Genachowski, Michael Copps, and the Full Commission, will agree with Ms. Smith…. [ß Wait for it, Psycho. Your reign of terror is coming to an end.]
Brian ‘Obsessive CROW’ K3VR ratcheting up the ugliness some more, on his anon. website 6 Mar ‘09
In early 2009, Laura Smith… took over Riley Hollingsworth's position at the FCC.
One positive development is an email written by Ms. Smith… stating her belief that the FCC has no intention of regulating the Internet. This is good news for FCC licensees who may have feared they would be penalized for speaking frankly on the Internet. [ß This should be “good news” especially—but pro tem only—to Brian CROW K3VR whose ~anonymous specialty on the WWW is Criminal Libel/Defamation.]
In one such case, the email referenced above was immediately seized upon by William F. Crowell, W6WBJ. According to a motion by Crowell, the FCC has apparently stated their intention to examine his "character" based on the content of his Internet postings, which is something Crowell has objected to. [ß As might you, Psycho, otherwise, you’re not only going to lose your licence, but arguably will land in Jail.] His motion, is apparently an attempt to use Ms. Smith’s email as prima facie evidence that the FCC does not regulate the content of Internet posts. [ß Psycho Brian would now dictate, to an Attorney, in his own case, whether and how he can ‘seize good news’. Has Brian’s HAMereekan Hubris no bounds?]
Ms. Smith came under fire in February and March, regarding what some called her 'shoot from both hips' approach to enforcement….
Madera is often jammed by unidentified stations [ß Incited by Psycho Brian, in his own words, as this page amply evidences.] who play music and noise effects in order to drown out his transmissions. There is no proof that any station Madera has ever named has taken part in the jamming…. [ß How does Brian know this? Ohh, never mind, I know: he’s Psychotic!]
In March, a potentially embarassing [ß sic] email, written by Ms. Smith, was sent to two FCC licensees, concerning official Commission business. [ß Nothing wrong with/embarrassing about that, even if exactly true.] The email quickly surfaced on the Internet, at blogs operated by Mark Morgan and Todd Daugherty. [ß Plenty wrong with that, especially if the e-mail was leaked by Randy ‘Racist’ BEST W7CPA, as is most likely and was 1st “surfaced” on the WWW by you, Psycho.] Online repartee referred to Ms. Smith's communication as a "1,000 word rant" that one reader described as “PMS on Steroids.” [ß That “repartee”, “rant” and PMS slur were not only YOURS but were and are on YOUR FRAUDulent website where the current subject piece of shit also resides, Psycho!]
According to our tips line [ß Is that anything like the 1-800-264-5980 number you FRAUDulently put up as part of your “International” Distress & FALSE SOS capers in mid-2008 ?], complaints were made to the FCC hierarchy regarding Ms. Smith's email, which has been termed "horrifying" and "abusive" by one present, and one former FCC employee, who both asked to remain anonymous. [ß Sure it was, if you/Riley say so. But, who is your mole at the FCC, Psycho?]
Conversations we have monitored on-air, have referred to the email as 'The Laura Doctrine' and many are hailing it as "a victory for free speech." Her remark about Karol Madera's diatribes, "Nothing I have heard thus far rises to the level of an actionable complaint" is now being interpreted as "anything goes" where speech over amateur radio is concerned…. [ß If you have the balls, Brian, which I doubt, put your silly interpretation to the test. GL in the KKKontest!]
In fact… according to Ms. Smith, although Madera's speech is "obnoxious," … it "does not necessarily rise to the level of obscene speech."….
Laura Smith, who has visited this website, and heard our audio recordings, had this to say about Mr. Madera:
"Indeed, were Karol an American, his speech would fall squarely under the 1st Amendment -- you know that thing many of our forefathers fought and died for (not to mention our troops overseas right now). When you call yourself patriotic, built within that statement is the acceptance of the Constitution and all it entails -- free speech is one of the cornerstones of that fine document. It doesn't mean only the speech YOU agree with; or only the speech that the majority of folks agree with; or even only speech that isn't offensive to most mature, rational adults. It means ALL speech -- the good, the bad, and yes, even the ugly (as Karol is quite often want [SIC] to spout)…. [ß If you’re going to shamelessly imitate me, at least do it correctly, sic and w/o e-shouting, Dimmi.]
We agree that 1st Amendment issues should be carefully guarded, indeed they should be sacrosanct…. [ß Is that your Royal “We” and what part of “sacrosanct” don’t you understand, Fucktard?] Ms. Smith's email has left us all shaking our heads and wondering. [ß You and Riley shaking your ‘little heads’ in this contrived ‘circle jerk’, ogled by Kris the ‘voyeuress’, does not count.] We wonder too if Julius Genachowski, Michael Copps, and the Full Commission, will agree with Ms. Smith…. [ß Wait for it, Psycho. Your reign of terror is coming to an end.]
Brian ‘Obsessive CROW’ K3VR ratcheting up the ugliness some more, on his anon. website 6 Mar ‘09
Wednesday, June 9, 2010
Here is K3VR - BRIAN CROW's take on this, as reported on the web site he edits (notice I didn't say owns).
14275 Saga Provokes 1,000 Word E-Rant by Laura Smith
The topic of the week centers around an email sent by the FCC's Laura L. Smith. Said email was republished at least 5 times by Todd Daugherty and Mark Morgan.
Since the email has been widely republished… [ß Admit it, initially by YOU, Psycho!] Ms. Smith's email is now firmly in the public domain. [ß Brian’s ‘circle jerk’ SOP and poor attempt at deflecting a charge of Defamation.]
On March 3rd, Mark Morgan reported he had been in almost continuous contact with Laura Smith. Morgan wrote "the letter may or may not be a fake apeartnnt the the letter was realesed to the net while LS herself is away from the office and her computer. I have from LS accepting then dening and now a not so fast I will get back to you on Sat." [ß Your point, Psycho?]
What's in Ms. Smith's email?
It's a lengthy email, at 1,000 words and seven paragraphs, and it outlines the new FCC Counsel's views in colorful language [ß I like her colourful language!], which may offend some readers. [ß But obviously not Coprophiliacs like you, Brian.]
The upshot of the email is that Laura Smith is PISSED (her words). According to published accounts, on March 3rd, Smith told two U.S. licensees that she had "just about reached the end of her rope with all the players" in what she called "this little drama."
Referring to Canadian, Karol Madera's speech, she told the licensees that the FCC regulates obscenity . ". . but general cursing and references to body parts… does not necessarily rise to the level of obscene speech." She continued, "Likewise, calling the President names and making general anti-American comments… while a sure sign of a lack of sensitivity… does not rise to the level of obscene or hate speech either." [ß Bravo, Laura!]
Ms. Smith also opined that speech which is "ugly (as Karol is quite often want [SIC] to spout)" would be protected speech in the U.S. [ß You’re a FRAUD Brian. What Laura said in the immediate context was: “It means ALL speech -- the good, the bad, and yes, even the ugly (as Karol is quite often wont to spout)….” Either that, or you damaged your brain, Brian—from the bottom—because of too much pounding on Riley’s cock.]
One reader had harsh words regarding the email. "Ms. Smith needs to review the FCC's website outlining what is obscene, indecent, and profane". The reader (an FCC licensee and a Washington, D.C. attorney who has testified on FCC matters before Congress) went on to provide several legal citations describing how profanity, indecency, and obscenity have historically been forbidden via amateur radio, and the broadcast media. [ß Was this your Keith ‘HARMONICA’ W7DXX whose Remote Internet Base you occasionally anon. use to QRM me? Also, don’t anon. ‘he said/she said’ about it, ~Glenn HAUSER DX LD fashion, Dimmi: cite it!]
He continued, "Children as young as 7 years old routinely [ß Routinely? Define “routinely”!] obtain their amateur licenses, and Laura Smith is either remiss in performing due diligence before making these irresponsible remarks, or, she's an idiot. [ß Bravo, Brian!] If she can't, or won't acknowledge that Madera's language is, at a minimum, usually indecent and profane [ß Again, define “usually”.], she ought to hang up her shingle and go back to being a lobbyist."
Smith made a few pointed [ß Define “pointed”.] remarks about Madera's "act" as she called it, writing, "I have requested that Karol tone down his act..." and she accurately described his on-air incitement, writing, "he is TRYING to incite you..." Smith promised her American readers, "he will/has not responded favorably to my request. He is going to continue the act." [ß Don’t know about “the act”, but Laura is right: I will continue, as is MY Canadian RIGHT.]
As for the numerous unknown individuals [ß The Muse is NOT amused!] in apparent violation of part 97, she wrote, "I have just about had it with the juvenile antics on the part of the American licensees." She also implied that, Americans are all being led around by Madera, whom she referred to as "a master manipulator." [ß That’s Karol VE7KFM—or “Sir”—to you, Puke.]
One commentator wrote, "Ironically, comically, Smith failed to include herself in the list of those who appear to be easily manipulated. She's already made an ass herself of herself, and she's only been involved for a month. What's next?" [ß YOU’RE NEXT, Psycho….]
As Ms. Smith vented her frustration, she wrote, "...playing bulletins and tapes of a deceased licensee, sound effects, endless playing of music, and general pre-pubescent behavior that quite a number of folks engage in on a daily basis at 14.275 needs to stop and needs to stop right now!"
We agree, although, a week later, at the time of this writing. It continues.... [ß Yes, it continues by your “anonymous” co-conspirators, inter alia your Bob EVANS WX4QN (the former WD4AWO) who repeatedly QRM’ed me on 14.275 MHz late on 8 Mar ’09.]
Ms. Smith continued in the same vein, throughout all 7 paragraphs of excited rhetoric. Unfortunately [ß “Unfortunately”? This has been the best thing to happen to the ARS since before ‘Rot’ Riley!], Ms. Smith unloaded her exasperation on two licensees, who were not the target of her obvious frustration. [ß Huhh? Non sequitur.] Apparently, her targets were Karol Madera, and, "the whole bunch of you." [ß Gentle reader: that’s what you get from sucking ‘Rot’ Riley’s cock for too long.]
Ms. Smith's main point was emphasized by the use of all caps, which is generally regarded as the e-version of shouting:
"RETALIATORY JAMMING WILL NOT BE TOLERATED AND IS IN VIOLATION OF THE RULES!"
Although she was only addressing two licensees, and we must stress again that neither licensee is the subject of current enforcement activity [ß Your source/mole?], she seemed to be writing for a wider audience.
"Can you tell I'm pissed?" Smith wrote. [ß We know already, above, and in e-shouting at that, Brian! So, why are you repeating this? After all ‘7 year-old children licencees’ could be reading this, HI.] "If you haven't yet figured it out let me clue you in here -- this behavior either stops now or everyone involved will find themselves on the receiving end of enforcement letters. This is an absolute disgrace -- I know kindergarteners that have shown a higher degree of maturity than the whole bunch of you!!"
We are not sure who "everyone involved" may be [ß It’s YOU and your Fucktards, Psycho.], or what kind of "enforcement letters" would be sent to "a whole bunch" of people, for violations of the unknown "lack of maturity" rule [ß Wait for it….], which has apparently been violated, but if we find out, you'll be the first to know.
Come to think of it, we've been waiting 3 years for the FCC to act on the license of Glenn Baxter, K1MAN, who received an affirmed Forfeiture in the amount of $21,000 on March 29, 2006, this after Baxter was finally fined, regarding complaints which the FCC had received since 1984.… [ß GL in the KKKontest!]
Insulting rhetoric, displaced anger, and feminine histrionics aside (but enough about Laura's email) we wish Laura Smith luck in her quest. Tracking down and writing "enforcement letters" to "a whole bunch" of anonymous Americans (?) licensed or not, will be a daunting task. [ß You seem to know a lot about this ‘bunch of anonymous Americans, licensed or not’. Why is that, Psycho?]
What are people saying about Laura Smith's email? [ß Are they your “human people” again, Psycho? (This was an ‘inside joke’ with Dr. PIPES.) Also, what’s with your anon. ‘he said/she said’ w/o names, from afar, on a cloaked website ‘as if’ by someone else ‘shtick’, Brian? Regardless, we’ll immediately take it to the (American) Bank, HI.]
We've received numerous comments (some frankly unprintable) [ß Print and be damned!] regarding what 9 out of 10 readers are calling "a complete lack of professionalism" and worse, with all that entails. [ß Lovely imitation, Psycho. Next time don’t forget the © thingy.]
Several attorneys [ß Much better than your usual “lots”, Dimmi.] wrote to comment that Ms. Smith is grossly in error regarding Part 97, as it applies to Madera's operation, were he a citizen of the United States. This is a moot point. Ms. Smith accurately observed that she has no jurisdiction in Canada, and any remarks made about Karol Madera, are obviously, her personal opinions. [ß Not so. She wrote qua SCARE.]
Some of our readers have stated their intention to send Ms. Smith's email to Dr. Kent Nilsson, FCC Inspector General, and to Kris Monteith, Chief of the FCC Enforcement Bureau, and others, including their Congressional Representatives, asking if Ms. Smith's hire truly represents the best interests of the people of the United States. [ß See earlier iterations, above, for what I think of this THREAT.]
Yet another reader wrote, "Surely Ms. Smith, has discovered the best way to ensure her own job security, while simultaneously spending hundreds of manhours [ß You’re sexist, PIG, HI.], and hundreds of thousands of taxpayer dollars, trying to track down countless anonymous individuals who engage in jamming out of pure frustration. [ß Convince them to engage you in muted circle jerks off-air/off the Internet instead.]
They jam a Canadian who spends an inordinate amount of time insulting what he calls the Excited States, while calling on al Qaida to slaughter Americans with roadside bombs." [ß Where does the quote begin, Dimmi?]
Others wrote to ask whether Ms. Smith was completely and properly vetted for the job; why the FCC hired someone with no experience in amateur radio matters, and; if Ms. Smith's hiring (at $200,000 ++) including salary and benefits, is really an appropriate use of taxpayer money, in this time of national fiscal crisis. [ß See earlier iteration, above, for what I think of this.]
For our part, Ms. Smith's good intentions notwithstanding [ß Brian: ‘not long ago I didn’t know how to spell ‘not-with-standing’ but now I “usually” suck cock on my knees’.], we fear Ms. Smith is destined to become even more frustrated. [ß Nowhere near as “frustrated” as you are, as this diatribe inter alia patently evidences.]
The lack of resources for amateur radio enforcement, and what the GAO called the "bureaucratic ineffectiveness" of the FCC, in general, along with the ingenuity of those jamming Madera's transmissions, and the sheer number of those engaged in civil disobedience, will all serve to make Ms. Smith's task a daunting one. [ß Wait for it, Psycho….]
K3VRN1FN in Fred ‘Hypocrite’ LLOYD AA7BQ’s “We don’t want your opinions here” on QRZ.com 9 Mar ‘09
14275 Saga Provokes 1,000 Word E-Rant by Laura Smith
The topic of the week centers around an email sent by the FCC's Laura L. Smith. Said email was republished at least 5 times by Todd Daugherty and Mark Morgan.
Since the email has been widely republished… [ß Admit it, initially by YOU, Psycho!] Ms. Smith's email is now firmly in the public domain. [ß Brian’s ‘circle jerk’ SOP and poor attempt at deflecting a charge of Defamation.]
On March 3rd, Mark Morgan reported he had been in almost continuous contact with Laura Smith. Morgan wrote "the letter may or may not be a fake apeartnnt the the letter was realesed to the net while LS herself is away from the office and her computer. I have from LS accepting then dening and now a not so fast I will get back to you on Sat." [ß Your point, Psycho?]
What's in Ms. Smith's email?
It's a lengthy email, at 1,000 words and seven paragraphs, and it outlines the new FCC Counsel's views in colorful language [ß I like her colourful language!], which may offend some readers. [ß But obviously not Coprophiliacs like you, Brian.]
The upshot of the email is that Laura Smith is PISSED (her words). According to published accounts, on March 3rd, Smith told two U.S. licensees that she had "just about reached the end of her rope with all the players" in what she called "this little drama."
Referring to Canadian, Karol Madera's speech, she told the licensees that the FCC regulates obscenity . ". . but general cursing and references to body parts… does not necessarily rise to the level of obscene speech." She continued, "Likewise, calling the President names and making general anti-American comments… while a sure sign of a lack of sensitivity… does not rise to the level of obscene or hate speech either." [ß Bravo, Laura!]
Ms. Smith also opined that speech which is "ugly (as Karol is quite often want [SIC] to spout)" would be protected speech in the U.S. [ß You’re a FRAUD Brian. What Laura said in the immediate context was: “It means ALL speech -- the good, the bad, and yes, even the ugly (as Karol is quite often wont to spout)….” Either that, or you damaged your brain, Brian—from the bottom—because of too much pounding on Riley’s cock.]
One reader had harsh words regarding the email. "Ms. Smith needs to review the FCC's website outlining what is obscene, indecent, and profane". The reader (an FCC licensee and a Washington, D.C. attorney who has testified on FCC matters before Congress) went on to provide several legal citations describing how profanity, indecency, and obscenity have historically been forbidden via amateur radio, and the broadcast media. [ß Was this your Keith ‘HARMONICA’ W7DXX whose Remote Internet Base you occasionally anon. use to QRM me? Also, don’t anon. ‘he said/she said’ about it, ~Glenn HAUSER DX LD fashion, Dimmi: cite it!]
He continued, "Children as young as 7 years old routinely [ß Routinely? Define “routinely”!] obtain their amateur licenses, and Laura Smith is either remiss in performing due diligence before making these irresponsible remarks, or, she's an idiot. [ß Bravo, Brian!] If she can't, or won't acknowledge that Madera's language is, at a minimum, usually indecent and profane [ß Again, define “usually”.], she ought to hang up her shingle and go back to being a lobbyist."
Smith made a few pointed [ß Define “pointed”.] remarks about Madera's "act" as she called it, writing, "I have requested that Karol tone down his act..." and she accurately described his on-air incitement, writing, "he is TRYING to incite you..." Smith promised her American readers, "he will/has not responded favorably to my request. He is going to continue the act." [ß Don’t know about “the act”, but Laura is right: I will continue, as is MY Canadian RIGHT.]
As for the numerous unknown individuals [ß The Muse is NOT amused!] in apparent violation of part 97, she wrote, "I have just about had it with the juvenile antics on the part of the American licensees." She also implied that, Americans are all being led around by Madera, whom she referred to as "a master manipulator." [ß That’s Karol VE7KFM—or “Sir”—to you, Puke.]
One commentator wrote, "Ironically, comically, Smith failed to include herself in the list of those who appear to be easily manipulated. She's already made an ass herself of herself, and she's only been involved for a month. What's next?" [ß YOU’RE NEXT, Psycho….]
As Ms. Smith vented her frustration, she wrote, "...playing bulletins and tapes of a deceased licensee, sound effects, endless playing of music, and general pre-pubescent behavior that quite a number of folks engage in on a daily basis at 14.275 needs to stop and needs to stop right now!"
We agree, although, a week later, at the time of this writing. It continues.... [ß Yes, it continues by your “anonymous” co-conspirators, inter alia your Bob EVANS WX4QN (the former WD4AWO) who repeatedly QRM’ed me on 14.275 MHz late on 8 Mar ’09.]
Ms. Smith continued in the same vein, throughout all 7 paragraphs of excited rhetoric. Unfortunately [ß “Unfortunately”? This has been the best thing to happen to the ARS since before ‘Rot’ Riley!], Ms. Smith unloaded her exasperation on two licensees, who were not the target of her obvious frustration. [ß Huhh? Non sequitur.] Apparently, her targets were Karol Madera, and, "the whole bunch of you." [ß Gentle reader: that’s what you get from sucking ‘Rot’ Riley’s cock for too long.]
Ms. Smith's main point was emphasized by the use of all caps, which is generally regarded as the e-version of shouting:
"RETALIATORY JAMMING WILL NOT BE TOLERATED AND IS IN VIOLATION OF THE RULES!"
Although she was only addressing two licensees, and we must stress again that neither licensee is the subject of current enforcement activity [ß Your source/mole?], she seemed to be writing for a wider audience.
"Can you tell I'm pissed?" Smith wrote. [ß We know already, above, and in e-shouting at that, Brian! So, why are you repeating this? After all ‘7 year-old children licencees’ could be reading this, HI.] "If you haven't yet figured it out let me clue you in here -- this behavior either stops now or everyone involved will find themselves on the receiving end of enforcement letters. This is an absolute disgrace -- I know kindergarteners that have shown a higher degree of maturity than the whole bunch of you!!"
We are not sure who "everyone involved" may be [ß It’s YOU and your Fucktards, Psycho.], or what kind of "enforcement letters" would be sent to "a whole bunch" of people, for violations of the unknown "lack of maturity" rule [ß Wait for it….], which has apparently been violated, but if we find out, you'll be the first to know.
Come to think of it, we've been waiting 3 years for the FCC to act on the license of Glenn Baxter, K1MAN, who received an affirmed Forfeiture in the amount of $21,000 on March 29, 2006, this after Baxter was finally fined, regarding complaints which the FCC had received since 1984.… [ß GL in the KKKontest!]
Insulting rhetoric, displaced anger, and feminine histrionics aside (but enough about Laura's email) we wish Laura Smith luck in her quest. Tracking down and writing "enforcement letters" to "a whole bunch" of anonymous Americans (?) licensed or not, will be a daunting task. [ß You seem to know a lot about this ‘bunch of anonymous Americans, licensed or not’. Why is that, Psycho?]
What are people saying about Laura Smith's email? [ß Are they your “human people” again, Psycho? (This was an ‘inside joke’ with Dr. PIPES.) Also, what’s with your anon. ‘he said/she said’ w/o names, from afar, on a cloaked website ‘as if’ by someone else ‘shtick’, Brian? Regardless, we’ll immediately take it to the (American) Bank, HI.]
We've received numerous comments (some frankly unprintable) [ß Print and be damned!] regarding what 9 out of 10 readers are calling "a complete lack of professionalism" and worse, with all that entails. [ß Lovely imitation, Psycho. Next time don’t forget the © thingy.]
Several attorneys [ß Much better than your usual “lots”, Dimmi.] wrote to comment that Ms. Smith is grossly in error regarding Part 97, as it applies to Madera's operation, were he a citizen of the United States. This is a moot point. Ms. Smith accurately observed that she has no jurisdiction in Canada, and any remarks made about Karol Madera, are obviously, her personal opinions. [ß Not so. She wrote qua SCARE.]
Some of our readers have stated their intention to send Ms. Smith's email to Dr. Kent Nilsson, FCC Inspector General, and to Kris Monteith, Chief of the FCC Enforcement Bureau, and others, including their Congressional Representatives, asking if Ms. Smith's hire truly represents the best interests of the people of the United States. [ß See earlier iterations, above, for what I think of this THREAT.]
Yet another reader wrote, "Surely Ms. Smith, has discovered the best way to ensure her own job security, while simultaneously spending hundreds of manhours [ß You’re sexist, PIG, HI.], and hundreds of thousands of taxpayer dollars, trying to track down countless anonymous individuals who engage in jamming out of pure frustration. [ß Convince them to engage you in muted circle jerks off-air/off the Internet instead.]
They jam a Canadian who spends an inordinate amount of time insulting what he calls the Excited States, while calling on al Qaida to slaughter Americans with roadside bombs." [ß Where does the quote begin, Dimmi?]
Others wrote to ask whether Ms. Smith was completely and properly vetted for the job; why the FCC hired someone with no experience in amateur radio matters, and; if Ms. Smith's hiring (at $200,000 ++) including salary and benefits, is really an appropriate use of taxpayer money, in this time of national fiscal crisis. [ß See earlier iteration, above, for what I think of this.]
For our part, Ms. Smith's good intentions notwithstanding [ß Brian: ‘not long ago I didn’t know how to spell ‘not-with-standing’ but now I “usually” suck cock on my knees’.], we fear Ms. Smith is destined to become even more frustrated. [ß Nowhere near as “frustrated” as you are, as this diatribe inter alia patently evidences.]
The lack of resources for amateur radio enforcement, and what the GAO called the "bureaucratic ineffectiveness" of the FCC, in general, along with the ingenuity of those jamming Madera's transmissions, and the sheer number of those engaged in civil disobedience, will all serve to make Ms. Smith's task a daunting one. [ß Wait for it, Psycho….]
K3VRN1FN in Fred ‘Hypocrite’ LLOYD AA7BQ’s “We don’t want your opinions here” on QRZ.com 9 Mar ‘09
Monday, June 7, 2010
Occasionally I assist various federal agencies in the apprehension of people at odds with society, and the law. My work with the government has brought me into contact with some very unsavory elements…. [ß We know, Psycho: Riley K4ZDH, Tom N1FM/n1sob, etc.] I have always prevailed against such enemies. You have been warned. [ß HAMereekan HUBRIS… needing ‘heavier metal treatment’ than the traditional but now much too valuable Lithium.]
Brian ‘At Odds With Society’ CROW K3VR delusional in ‘The Truth About www.suckK3VRoff.com‘ 26 Apr ‘09
Brian ‘At Odds With Society’ CROW K3VR delusional in ‘The Truth About www.suckK3VRoff.com‘ 26 Apr ‘09
Saturday, June 5, 2010
Smith's email of March, 2009 to two Arizona amateur operators exemplifies everything that's wrong with some of the attitudes in the federal government. Not all of the attitudes, mind you. Some federal employees are competent and dedicated public servants. [ß I believe that the latter refers to ‘Rot’ Riley and possibly also to the “3 Douchebags” in the FCC EB being hammered by Bill W6WBJ.]
However, Laura Smith's email, and her complete and utter failure to publicly apologize for her abusive rhetoric, is the kind of mean-spirited, arrogant, big government, holier-than-thou, talking-down-to-the-citizenry, CRAP that President Obama should attempt to completely purge from government, if he really wants to avoid widening the "confidence gap." [ß Congratulations, Laura, for being the 3rd person, in as many years, to be subject to this type of vitriol/‘odd formulary’ [FYI the “publicly apologize” demand was used on K1MAN & VE7KFM before you]. And speaking of “CRAP”, don’t even think of apologizing to a Socio/Psychopath and patent Coprophiliac.]
It's not just the blatant appearance of nepotism involved in Smith's hiring. Her husband and father-in-law both work/ed for the FCC, leading to an appearance of impropriety, at the very least. [ß Nepotism: only if you say so, Psycho. But why didn’t you mention that Laura was hired by your Right Wing punk, Kevin MARTIN, in the waning days of the Bush-wacker Era? Or is this too inconvenient for you?]
It's not the fact that she doesn't qualify for the most basic amateur radio license, yet she's tasked to exhibit expertise about the service. [ß Gentle reader: peruse ‘QeerZ’, which Psycho styles as ‘the most popular amateur radio website in the world’, for the amount of “expertise” exhibited by licensed HAMereekans.]
It's not the fact that she appears to lack subject matter competence when it comes to analyzing the technical matters required to do her job properly. [ß There are precious few “technical matters” on her plate. Arguably, everything Laura needs to discharge her ARS “subject matter competence”, she learned in Grade School.]
It's not even the lack of punishment involved in the Indianapolis Police Department Radio Scandal, that frankly stinks to heaven. [ß Is that anything like the ‘stink’ of your demonstrated anal/fecal obsession and Coprophilia, Brian? But, I agree: Laura should have had the criminals-in-uniform shot at dawn, before breakfast. Come to think of it, she still has a chance to atone for being a slow learner—by summarily “executing” Tom ‘Mother-Fucker’ WHATLEY N1FM/n1sob, YOUR sometime criminal-in-uniform.]
It's not any of those things. [ß OK. So, why the hyperbolic Litany, above?] Rather, it's her smug, condescending, abusive treatment of taxpayers and other FCC stakeholders that makes Laura Smith a DUD in her role as Special Counsel. [ß Nothing terribly wrong with “smug” or even “condescending”, if you’re talking to patent IDIOTS like YOU/yours and have “subject matter expertise” (the “Special Counsel” inter alia refers), unlike your ‘smug & descending’ (that’s “going down” in the vernacular) on your ‘Rot’ Riley in the Gettysburg Bath-House. As for “abusive”, just read your own prose herein and on this page alone, then look at the reflection in your computer monitor and seriously consider taking ‘The Final Exit’, like your sometime BUD ‘Rambo Dan’ did to such good effect recently.]
Laura Smith is ham radio's new poster child for what's wrong with the federal government…. [ß Bravo Laura! Can I have an autographed copy?]
The lack of confidence in government -- the gap many of us see and lament on a daily basis -- can be summed up by pointing frequently to those few insulting sentences written by Laura Smith of the FCC Enforcement Bureau:
"I sure wish we could regulate stupidity -- but it just isn't within the current confines of the rules. If it were, every single one of the actors here would be slapped with a fine just for being stupid/gullible and wasting my time..." [ß Despite his doctored ‘continuous loop’ tapes (used for malicious QRM’ing) incorporating this very formulary, Brian must also have forgotten what ‘Rot’ Riley said at the 2007 Hamvention (patently about HIM and his co-conspirators in the context): “We can’t regulate stupid!”]
I can't imagine why Laura Smith is still on the FCC's payroll. [ß Wait for it…. I can “imagine” her yanking YOUR licence, Psycho and soon.] Maybe it's just to remind us that talk is cheap, and cheap shots made via email are even cheaper. [ß There is nothing cheaper/scuzzier than FRAUDulent, ANONymous, Cloaked DEFAMATION obtusely written in the 3rd person by the likes of a ‘circle jerking’ coward like you, Brian!] By now it should be abundantly clear, that if President Obama's really serious about cutting costs, the FCC has some low-hanging fruit, just ripe for the picking. [ß Brian you Psycho, don’t forget to attribute “low-hanging fruit” to © ToeJoe N9PH.]
‘Psycho Brian’ K3VR continuing ‘circle jerk’/ratcheting up the ugliness against Laura, on his ANON website <28 Apr ‘09
However, Laura Smith's email, and her complete and utter failure to publicly apologize for her abusive rhetoric, is the kind of mean-spirited, arrogant, big government, holier-than-thou, talking-down-to-the-citizenry, CRAP that President Obama should attempt to completely purge from government, if he really wants to avoid widening the "confidence gap." [ß Congratulations, Laura, for being the 3rd person, in as many years, to be subject to this type of vitriol/‘odd formulary’ [FYI the “publicly apologize” demand was used on K1MAN & VE7KFM before you]. And speaking of “CRAP”, don’t even think of apologizing to a Socio/Psychopath and patent Coprophiliac.]
It's not just the blatant appearance of nepotism involved in Smith's hiring. Her husband and father-in-law both work/ed for the FCC, leading to an appearance of impropriety, at the very least. [ß Nepotism: only if you say so, Psycho. But why didn’t you mention that Laura was hired by your Right Wing punk, Kevin MARTIN, in the waning days of the Bush-wacker Era? Or is this too inconvenient for you?]
It's not the fact that she doesn't qualify for the most basic amateur radio license, yet she's tasked to exhibit expertise about the service. [ß Gentle reader: peruse ‘QeerZ’, which Psycho styles as ‘the most popular amateur radio website in the world’, for the amount of “expertise” exhibited by licensed HAMereekans.]
It's not the fact that she appears to lack subject matter competence when it comes to analyzing the technical matters required to do her job properly. [ß There are precious few “technical matters” on her plate. Arguably, everything Laura needs to discharge her ARS “subject matter competence”, she learned in Grade School.]
It's not even the lack of punishment involved in the Indianapolis Police Department Radio Scandal, that frankly stinks to heaven. [ß Is that anything like the ‘stink’ of your demonstrated anal/fecal obsession and Coprophilia, Brian? But, I agree: Laura should have had the criminals-in-uniform shot at dawn, before breakfast. Come to think of it, she still has a chance to atone for being a slow learner—by summarily “executing” Tom ‘Mother-Fucker’ WHATLEY N1FM/n1sob, YOUR sometime criminal-in-uniform.]
It's not any of those things. [ß OK. So, why the hyperbolic Litany, above?] Rather, it's her smug, condescending, abusive treatment of taxpayers and other FCC stakeholders that makes Laura Smith a DUD in her role as Special Counsel. [ß Nothing terribly wrong with “smug” or even “condescending”, if you’re talking to patent IDIOTS like YOU/yours and have “subject matter expertise” (the “Special Counsel” inter alia refers), unlike your ‘smug & descending’ (that’s “going down” in the vernacular) on your ‘Rot’ Riley in the Gettysburg Bath-House. As for “abusive”, just read your own prose herein and on this page alone, then look at the reflection in your computer monitor and seriously consider taking ‘The Final Exit’, like your sometime BUD ‘Rambo Dan’ did to such good effect recently.]
Laura Smith is ham radio's new poster child for what's wrong with the federal government…. [ß Bravo Laura! Can I have an autographed copy?]
The lack of confidence in government -- the gap many of us see and lament on a daily basis -- can be summed up by pointing frequently to those few insulting sentences written by Laura Smith of the FCC Enforcement Bureau:
"I sure wish we could regulate stupidity -- but it just isn't within the current confines of the rules. If it were, every single one of the actors here would be slapped with a fine just for being stupid/gullible and wasting my time..." [ß Despite his doctored ‘continuous loop’ tapes (used for malicious QRM’ing) incorporating this very formulary, Brian must also have forgotten what ‘Rot’ Riley said at the 2007 Hamvention (patently about HIM and his co-conspirators in the context): “We can’t regulate stupid!”]
I can't imagine why Laura Smith is still on the FCC's payroll. [ß Wait for it…. I can “imagine” her yanking YOUR licence, Psycho and soon.] Maybe it's just to remind us that talk is cheap, and cheap shots made via email are even cheaper. [ß There is nothing cheaper/scuzzier than FRAUDulent, ANONymous, Cloaked DEFAMATION obtusely written in the 3rd person by the likes of a ‘circle jerking’ coward like you, Brian!] By now it should be abundantly clear, that if President Obama's really serious about cutting costs, the FCC has some low-hanging fruit, just ripe for the picking. [ß Brian you Psycho, don’t forget to attribute “low-hanging fruit” to © ToeJoe N9PH.]
‘Psycho Brian’ K3VR continuing ‘circle jerk’/ratcheting up the ugliness against Laura, on his ANON website <28 Apr ‘09
Thursday, June 3, 2010
Tuesday, June 1, 2010
K3VR has sent you a link to a blog:
As you can see from this post, Dan [W4NTI (SK)] is alive and well and posting, numbnuts. [ß Non sequiturs, again/still Brian?] Your QSO with Dan was not illegal after all, so I'm letting you go this time. [ß Mighty white of you, Tonto.] Sooner or later, you'll screw up though, and then I'll nail you. [ß The way you’re going Brian, sooner or later someone is going to “nail you”—to the proverbial cross—or simply put a bullet in your head! Either way, I hope it’s sooner, Psycho.]
Brian ‘FRAUDulent Re-Mailer’ CROW K3VR to Mark on “ACCOUNTS OF THE KOSHER HAM” 9 Jun ‘09
As you can see from this post, Dan [W4NTI (SK)] is alive and well and posting, numbnuts. [ß Non sequiturs, again/still Brian?] Your QSO with Dan was not illegal after all, so I'm letting you go this time. [ß Mighty white of you, Tonto.] Sooner or later, you'll screw up though, and then I'll nail you. [ß The way you’re going Brian, sooner or later someone is going to “nail you”—to the proverbial cross—or simply put a bullet in your head! Either way, I hope it’s sooner, Psycho.]
Brian ‘FRAUDulent Re-Mailer’ CROW K3VR to Mark on “ACCOUNTS OF THE KOSHER HAM” 9 Jun ‘09
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
