Saturday, June 12, 2010
Friday, June 11, 2010
Laura L. Smith, FCC Enforcement Bureau [ß Published as a parody of her Bio.]
In early 2009, Laura Smith… took over Riley Hollingsworth's position at the FCC.
One positive development is an email written by Ms. Smith… stating her belief that the FCC has no intention of regulating the Internet. This is good news for FCC licensees who may have feared they would be penalized for speaking frankly on the Internet. [ß This should be “good news” especially—but pro tem only—to Brian CROW K3VR whose ~anonymous specialty on the WWW is Criminal Libel/Defamation.]
In one such case, the email referenced above was immediately seized upon by William F. Crowell, W6WBJ. According to a motion by Crowell, the FCC has apparently stated their intention to examine his "character" based on the content of his Internet postings, which is something Crowell has objected to. [ß As might you, Psycho, otherwise, you’re not only going to lose your licence, but arguably will land in Jail.] His motion, is apparently an attempt to use Ms. Smith’s email as prima facie evidence that the FCC does not regulate the content of Internet posts. [ß Psycho Brian would now dictate, to an Attorney, in his own case, whether and how he can ‘seize good news’. Has Brian’s HAMereekan Hubris no bounds?]
Ms. Smith came under fire in February and March, regarding what some called her 'shoot from both hips' approach to enforcement….
Madera is often jammed by unidentified stations [ß Incited by Psycho Brian, in his own words, as this page amply evidences.] who play music and noise effects in order to drown out his transmissions. There is no proof that any station Madera has ever named has taken part in the jamming…. [ß How does Brian know this? Ohh, never mind, I know: he’s Psychotic!]
In March, a potentially embarassing [ß sic] email, written by Ms. Smith, was sent to two FCC licensees, concerning official Commission business. [ß Nothing wrong with/embarrassing about that, even if exactly true.] The email quickly surfaced on the Internet, at blogs operated by Mark Morgan and Todd Daugherty. [ß Plenty wrong with that, especially if the e-mail was leaked by Randy ‘Racist’ BEST W7CPA, as is most likely and was 1st “surfaced” on the WWW by you, Psycho.] Online repartee referred to Ms. Smith's communication as a "1,000 word rant" that one reader described as “PMS on Steroids.” [ß That “repartee”, “rant” and PMS slur were not only YOURS but were and are on YOUR FRAUDulent website where the current subject piece of shit also resides, Psycho!]
According to our tips line [ß Is that anything like the 1-800-264-5980 number you FRAUDulently put up as part of your “International” Distress & FALSE SOS capers in mid-2008 ?], complaints were made to the FCC hierarchy regarding Ms. Smith's email, which has been termed "horrifying" and "abusive" by one present, and one former FCC employee, who both asked to remain anonymous. [ß Sure it was, if you/Riley say so. But, who is your mole at the FCC, Psycho?]
Conversations we have monitored on-air, have referred to the email as 'The Laura Doctrine' and many are hailing it as "a victory for free speech." Her remark about Karol Madera's diatribes, "Nothing I have heard thus far rises to the level of an actionable complaint" is now being interpreted as "anything goes" where speech over amateur radio is concerned…. [ß If you have the balls, Brian, which I doubt, put your silly interpretation to the test. GL in the KKKontest!]
In fact… according to Ms. Smith, although Madera's speech is "obnoxious," … it "does not necessarily rise to the level of obscene speech."….
Laura Smith, who has visited this website, and heard our audio recordings, had this to say about Mr. Madera:
"Indeed, were Karol an American, his speech would fall squarely under the 1st Amendment -- you know that thing many of our forefathers fought and died for (not to mention our troops overseas right now). When you call yourself patriotic, built within that statement is the acceptance of the Constitution and all it entails -- free speech is one of the cornerstones of that fine document. It doesn't mean only the speech YOU agree with; or only the speech that the majority of folks agree with; or even only speech that isn't offensive to most mature, rational adults. It means ALL speech -- the good, the bad, and yes, even the ugly (as Karol is quite often want [SIC] to spout)…. [ß If you’re going to shamelessly imitate me, at least do it correctly, sic and w/o e-shouting, Dimmi.]
We agree that 1st Amendment issues should be carefully guarded, indeed they should be sacrosanct…. [ß Is that your Royal “We” and what part of “sacrosanct” don’t you understand, Fucktard?] Ms. Smith's email has left us all shaking our heads and wondering. [ß You and Riley shaking your ‘little heads’ in this contrived ‘circle jerk’, ogled by Kris the ‘voyeuress’, does not count.] We wonder too if Julius Genachowski, Michael Copps, and the Full Commission, will agree with Ms. Smith…. [ß Wait for it, Psycho. Your reign of terror is coming to an end.]
Brian ‘Obsessive CROW’ K3VR ratcheting up the ugliness some more, on his anon. website 6 Mar ‘09
In early 2009, Laura Smith… took over Riley Hollingsworth's position at the FCC.
One positive development is an email written by Ms. Smith… stating her belief that the FCC has no intention of regulating the Internet. This is good news for FCC licensees who may have feared they would be penalized for speaking frankly on the Internet. [ß This should be “good news” especially—but pro tem only—to Brian CROW K3VR whose ~anonymous specialty on the WWW is Criminal Libel/Defamation.]
In one such case, the email referenced above was immediately seized upon by William F. Crowell, W6WBJ. According to a motion by Crowell, the FCC has apparently stated their intention to examine his "character" based on the content of his Internet postings, which is something Crowell has objected to. [ß As might you, Psycho, otherwise, you’re not only going to lose your licence, but arguably will land in Jail.] His motion, is apparently an attempt to use Ms. Smith’s email as prima facie evidence that the FCC does not regulate the content of Internet posts. [ß Psycho Brian would now dictate, to an Attorney, in his own case, whether and how he can ‘seize good news’. Has Brian’s HAMereekan Hubris no bounds?]
Ms. Smith came under fire in February and March, regarding what some called her 'shoot from both hips' approach to enforcement….
Madera is often jammed by unidentified stations [ß Incited by Psycho Brian, in his own words, as this page amply evidences.] who play music and noise effects in order to drown out his transmissions. There is no proof that any station Madera has ever named has taken part in the jamming…. [ß How does Brian know this? Ohh, never mind, I know: he’s Psychotic!]
In March, a potentially embarassing [ß sic] email, written by Ms. Smith, was sent to two FCC licensees, concerning official Commission business. [ß Nothing wrong with/embarrassing about that, even if exactly true.] The email quickly surfaced on the Internet, at blogs operated by Mark Morgan and Todd Daugherty. [ß Plenty wrong with that, especially if the e-mail was leaked by Randy ‘Racist’ BEST W7CPA, as is most likely and was 1st “surfaced” on the WWW by you, Psycho.] Online repartee referred to Ms. Smith's communication as a "1,000 word rant" that one reader described as “PMS on Steroids.” [ß That “repartee”, “rant” and PMS slur were not only YOURS but were and are on YOUR FRAUDulent website where the current subject piece of shit also resides, Psycho!]
According to our tips line [ß Is that anything like the 1-800-264-5980 number you FRAUDulently put up as part of your “International” Distress & FALSE SOS capers in mid-2008 ?], complaints were made to the FCC hierarchy regarding Ms. Smith's email, which has been termed "horrifying" and "abusive" by one present, and one former FCC employee, who both asked to remain anonymous. [ß Sure it was, if you/Riley say so. But, who is your mole at the FCC, Psycho?]
Conversations we have monitored on-air, have referred to the email as 'The Laura Doctrine' and many are hailing it as "a victory for free speech." Her remark about Karol Madera's diatribes, "Nothing I have heard thus far rises to the level of an actionable complaint" is now being interpreted as "anything goes" where speech over amateur radio is concerned…. [ß If you have the balls, Brian, which I doubt, put your silly interpretation to the test. GL in the KKKontest!]
In fact… according to Ms. Smith, although Madera's speech is "obnoxious," … it "does not necessarily rise to the level of obscene speech."….
Laura Smith, who has visited this website, and heard our audio recordings, had this to say about Mr. Madera:
"Indeed, were Karol an American, his speech would fall squarely under the 1st Amendment -- you know that thing many of our forefathers fought and died for (not to mention our troops overseas right now). When you call yourself patriotic, built within that statement is the acceptance of the Constitution and all it entails -- free speech is one of the cornerstones of that fine document. It doesn't mean only the speech YOU agree with; or only the speech that the majority of folks agree with; or even only speech that isn't offensive to most mature, rational adults. It means ALL speech -- the good, the bad, and yes, even the ugly (as Karol is quite often want [SIC] to spout)…. [ß If you’re going to shamelessly imitate me, at least do it correctly, sic and w/o e-shouting, Dimmi.]
We agree that 1st Amendment issues should be carefully guarded, indeed they should be sacrosanct…. [ß Is that your Royal “We” and what part of “sacrosanct” don’t you understand, Fucktard?] Ms. Smith's email has left us all shaking our heads and wondering. [ß You and Riley shaking your ‘little heads’ in this contrived ‘circle jerk’, ogled by Kris the ‘voyeuress’, does not count.] We wonder too if Julius Genachowski, Michael Copps, and the Full Commission, will agree with Ms. Smith…. [ß Wait for it, Psycho. Your reign of terror is coming to an end.]
Brian ‘Obsessive CROW’ K3VR ratcheting up the ugliness some more, on his anon. website 6 Mar ‘09
Wednesday, June 9, 2010
Here is K3VR - BRIAN CROW's take on this, as reported on the web site he edits (notice I didn't say owns).
14275 Saga Provokes 1,000 Word E-Rant by Laura Smith
The topic of the week centers around an email sent by the FCC's Laura L. Smith. Said email was republished at least 5 times by Todd Daugherty and Mark Morgan.
Since the email has been widely republished… [ß Admit it, initially by YOU, Psycho!] Ms. Smith's email is now firmly in the public domain. [ß Brian’s ‘circle jerk’ SOP and poor attempt at deflecting a charge of Defamation.]
On March 3rd, Mark Morgan reported he had been in almost continuous contact with Laura Smith. Morgan wrote "the letter may or may not be a fake apeartnnt the the letter was realesed to the net while LS herself is away from the office and her computer. I have from LS accepting then dening and now a not so fast I will get back to you on Sat." [ß Your point, Psycho?]
What's in Ms. Smith's email?
It's a lengthy email, at 1,000 words and seven paragraphs, and it outlines the new FCC Counsel's views in colorful language [ß I like her colourful language!], which may offend some readers. [ß But obviously not Coprophiliacs like you, Brian.]
The upshot of the email is that Laura Smith is PISSED (her words). According to published accounts, on March 3rd, Smith told two U.S. licensees that she had "just about reached the end of her rope with all the players" in what she called "this little drama."
Referring to Canadian, Karol Madera's speech, she told the licensees that the FCC regulates obscenity . ". . but general cursing and references to body parts… does not necessarily rise to the level of obscene speech." She continued, "Likewise, calling the President names and making general anti-American comments… while a sure sign of a lack of sensitivity… does not rise to the level of obscene or hate speech either." [ß Bravo, Laura!]
Ms. Smith also opined that speech which is "ugly (as Karol is quite often want [SIC] to spout)" would be protected speech in the U.S. [ß You’re a FRAUD Brian. What Laura said in the immediate context was: “It means ALL speech -- the good, the bad, and yes, even the ugly (as Karol is quite often wont to spout)….” Either that, or you damaged your brain, Brian—from the bottom—because of too much pounding on Riley’s cock.]
One reader had harsh words regarding the email. "Ms. Smith needs to review the FCC's website outlining what is obscene, indecent, and profane". The reader (an FCC licensee and a Washington, D.C. attorney who has testified on FCC matters before Congress) went on to provide several legal citations describing how profanity, indecency, and obscenity have historically been forbidden via amateur radio, and the broadcast media. [ß Was this your Keith ‘HARMONICA’ W7DXX whose Remote Internet Base you occasionally anon. use to QRM me? Also, don’t anon. ‘he said/she said’ about it, ~Glenn HAUSER DX LD fashion, Dimmi: cite it!]
He continued, "Children as young as 7 years old routinely [ß Routinely? Define “routinely”!] obtain their amateur licenses, and Laura Smith is either remiss in performing due diligence before making these irresponsible remarks, or, she's an idiot. [ß Bravo, Brian!] If she can't, or won't acknowledge that Madera's language is, at a minimum, usually indecent and profane [ß Again, define “usually”.], she ought to hang up her shingle and go back to being a lobbyist."
Smith made a few pointed [ß Define “pointed”.] remarks about Madera's "act" as she called it, writing, "I have requested that Karol tone down his act..." and she accurately described his on-air incitement, writing, "he is TRYING to incite you..." Smith promised her American readers, "he will/has not responded favorably to my request. He is going to continue the act." [ß Don’t know about “the act”, but Laura is right: I will continue, as is MY Canadian RIGHT.]
As for the numerous unknown individuals [ß The Muse is NOT amused!] in apparent violation of part 97, she wrote, "I have just about had it with the juvenile antics on the part of the American licensees." She also implied that, Americans are all being led around by Madera, whom she referred to as "a master manipulator." [ß That’s Karol VE7KFM—or “Sir”—to you, Puke.]
One commentator wrote, "Ironically, comically, Smith failed to include herself in the list of those who appear to be easily manipulated. She's already made an ass herself of herself, and she's only been involved for a month. What's next?" [ß YOU’RE NEXT, Psycho….]
As Ms. Smith vented her frustration, she wrote, "...playing bulletins and tapes of a deceased licensee, sound effects, endless playing of music, and general pre-pubescent behavior that quite a number of folks engage in on a daily basis at 14.275 needs to stop and needs to stop right now!"
We agree, although, a week later, at the time of this writing. It continues.... [ß Yes, it continues by your “anonymous” co-conspirators, inter alia your Bob EVANS WX4QN (the former WD4AWO) who repeatedly QRM’ed me on 14.275 MHz late on 8 Mar ’09.]
Ms. Smith continued in the same vein, throughout all 7 paragraphs of excited rhetoric. Unfortunately [ß “Unfortunately”? This has been the best thing to happen to the ARS since before ‘Rot’ Riley!], Ms. Smith unloaded her exasperation on two licensees, who were not the target of her obvious frustration. [ß Huhh? Non sequitur.] Apparently, her targets were Karol Madera, and, "the whole bunch of you." [ß Gentle reader: that’s what you get from sucking ‘Rot’ Riley’s cock for too long.]
Ms. Smith's main point was emphasized by the use of all caps, which is generally regarded as the e-version of shouting:
"RETALIATORY JAMMING WILL NOT BE TOLERATED AND IS IN VIOLATION OF THE RULES!"
Although she was only addressing two licensees, and we must stress again that neither licensee is the subject of current enforcement activity [ß Your source/mole?], she seemed to be writing for a wider audience.
"Can you tell I'm pissed?" Smith wrote. [ß We know already, above, and in e-shouting at that, Brian! So, why are you repeating this? After all ‘7 year-old children licencees’ could be reading this, HI.] "If you haven't yet figured it out let me clue you in here -- this behavior either stops now or everyone involved will find themselves on the receiving end of enforcement letters. This is an absolute disgrace -- I know kindergarteners that have shown a higher degree of maturity than the whole bunch of you!!"
We are not sure who "everyone involved" may be [ß It’s YOU and your Fucktards, Psycho.], or what kind of "enforcement letters" would be sent to "a whole bunch" of people, for violations of the unknown "lack of maturity" rule [ß Wait for it….], which has apparently been violated, but if we find out, you'll be the first to know.
Come to think of it, we've been waiting 3 years for the FCC to act on the license of Glenn Baxter, K1MAN, who received an affirmed Forfeiture in the amount of $21,000 on March 29, 2006, this after Baxter was finally fined, regarding complaints which the FCC had received since 1984.… [ß GL in the KKKontest!]
Insulting rhetoric, displaced anger, and feminine histrionics aside (but enough about Laura's email) we wish Laura Smith luck in her quest. Tracking down and writing "enforcement letters" to "a whole bunch" of anonymous Americans (?) licensed or not, will be a daunting task. [ß You seem to know a lot about this ‘bunch of anonymous Americans, licensed or not’. Why is that, Psycho?]
What are people saying about Laura Smith's email? [ß Are they your “human people” again, Psycho? (This was an ‘inside joke’ with Dr. PIPES.) Also, what’s with your anon. ‘he said/she said’ w/o names, from afar, on a cloaked website ‘as if’ by someone else ‘shtick’, Brian? Regardless, we’ll immediately take it to the (American) Bank, HI.]
We've received numerous comments (some frankly unprintable) [ß Print and be damned!] regarding what 9 out of 10 readers are calling "a complete lack of professionalism" and worse, with all that entails. [ß Lovely imitation, Psycho. Next time don’t forget the © thingy.]
Several attorneys [ß Much better than your usual “lots”, Dimmi.] wrote to comment that Ms. Smith is grossly in error regarding Part 97, as it applies to Madera's operation, were he a citizen of the United States. This is a moot point. Ms. Smith accurately observed that she has no jurisdiction in Canada, and any remarks made about Karol Madera, are obviously, her personal opinions. [ß Not so. She wrote qua SCARE.]
Some of our readers have stated their intention to send Ms. Smith's email to Dr. Kent Nilsson, FCC Inspector General, and to Kris Monteith, Chief of the FCC Enforcement Bureau, and others, including their Congressional Representatives, asking if Ms. Smith's hire truly represents the best interests of the people of the United States. [ß See earlier iterations, above, for what I think of this THREAT.]
Yet another reader wrote, "Surely Ms. Smith, has discovered the best way to ensure her own job security, while simultaneously spending hundreds of manhours [ß You’re sexist, PIG, HI.], and hundreds of thousands of taxpayer dollars, trying to track down countless anonymous individuals who engage in jamming out of pure frustration. [ß Convince them to engage you in muted circle jerks off-air/off the Internet instead.]
They jam a Canadian who spends an inordinate amount of time insulting what he calls the Excited States, while calling on al Qaida to slaughter Americans with roadside bombs." [ß Where does the quote begin, Dimmi?]
Others wrote to ask whether Ms. Smith was completely and properly vetted for the job; why the FCC hired someone with no experience in amateur radio matters, and; if Ms. Smith's hiring (at $200,000 ++) including salary and benefits, is really an appropriate use of taxpayer money, in this time of national fiscal crisis. [ß See earlier iteration, above, for what I think of this.]
For our part, Ms. Smith's good intentions notwithstanding [ß Brian: ‘not long ago I didn’t know how to spell ‘not-with-standing’ but now I “usually” suck cock on my knees’.], we fear Ms. Smith is destined to become even more frustrated. [ß Nowhere near as “frustrated” as you are, as this diatribe inter alia patently evidences.]
The lack of resources for amateur radio enforcement, and what the GAO called the "bureaucratic ineffectiveness" of the FCC, in general, along with the ingenuity of those jamming Madera's transmissions, and the sheer number of those engaged in civil disobedience, will all serve to make Ms. Smith's task a daunting one. [ß Wait for it, Psycho….]
K3VRN1FN in Fred ‘Hypocrite’ LLOYD AA7BQ’s “We don’t want your opinions here” on QRZ.com 9 Mar ‘09
14275 Saga Provokes 1,000 Word E-Rant by Laura Smith
The topic of the week centers around an email sent by the FCC's Laura L. Smith. Said email was republished at least 5 times by Todd Daugherty and Mark Morgan.
Since the email has been widely republished… [ß Admit it, initially by YOU, Psycho!] Ms. Smith's email is now firmly in the public domain. [ß Brian’s ‘circle jerk’ SOP and poor attempt at deflecting a charge of Defamation.]
On March 3rd, Mark Morgan reported he had been in almost continuous contact with Laura Smith. Morgan wrote "the letter may or may not be a fake apeartnnt the the letter was realesed to the net while LS herself is away from the office and her computer. I have from LS accepting then dening and now a not so fast I will get back to you on Sat." [ß Your point, Psycho?]
What's in Ms. Smith's email?
It's a lengthy email, at 1,000 words and seven paragraphs, and it outlines the new FCC Counsel's views in colorful language [ß I like her colourful language!], which may offend some readers. [ß But obviously not Coprophiliacs like you, Brian.]
The upshot of the email is that Laura Smith is PISSED (her words). According to published accounts, on March 3rd, Smith told two U.S. licensees that she had "just about reached the end of her rope with all the players" in what she called "this little drama."
Referring to Canadian, Karol Madera's speech, she told the licensees that the FCC regulates obscenity . ". . but general cursing and references to body parts… does not necessarily rise to the level of obscene speech." She continued, "Likewise, calling the President names and making general anti-American comments… while a sure sign of a lack of sensitivity… does not rise to the level of obscene or hate speech either." [ß Bravo, Laura!]
Ms. Smith also opined that speech which is "ugly (as Karol is quite often want [SIC] to spout)" would be protected speech in the U.S. [ß You’re a FRAUD Brian. What Laura said in the immediate context was: “It means ALL speech -- the good, the bad, and yes, even the ugly (as Karol is quite often wont to spout)….” Either that, or you damaged your brain, Brian—from the bottom—because of too much pounding on Riley’s cock.]
One reader had harsh words regarding the email. "Ms. Smith needs to review the FCC's website outlining what is obscene, indecent, and profane". The reader (an FCC licensee and a Washington, D.C. attorney who has testified on FCC matters before Congress) went on to provide several legal citations describing how profanity, indecency, and obscenity have historically been forbidden via amateur radio, and the broadcast media. [ß Was this your Keith ‘HARMONICA’ W7DXX whose Remote Internet Base you occasionally anon. use to QRM me? Also, don’t anon. ‘he said/she said’ about it, ~Glenn HAUSER DX LD fashion, Dimmi: cite it!]
He continued, "Children as young as 7 years old routinely [ß Routinely? Define “routinely”!] obtain their amateur licenses, and Laura Smith is either remiss in performing due diligence before making these irresponsible remarks, or, she's an idiot. [ß Bravo, Brian!] If she can't, or won't acknowledge that Madera's language is, at a minimum, usually indecent and profane [ß Again, define “usually”.], she ought to hang up her shingle and go back to being a lobbyist."
Smith made a few pointed [ß Define “pointed”.] remarks about Madera's "act" as she called it, writing, "I have requested that Karol tone down his act..." and she accurately described his on-air incitement, writing, "he is TRYING to incite you..." Smith promised her American readers, "he will/has not responded favorably to my request. He is going to continue the act." [ß Don’t know about “the act”, but Laura is right: I will continue, as is MY Canadian RIGHT.]
As for the numerous unknown individuals [ß The Muse is NOT amused!] in apparent violation of part 97, she wrote, "I have just about had it with the juvenile antics on the part of the American licensees." She also implied that, Americans are all being led around by Madera, whom she referred to as "a master manipulator." [ß That’s Karol VE7KFM—or “Sir”—to you, Puke.]
One commentator wrote, "Ironically, comically, Smith failed to include herself in the list of those who appear to be easily manipulated. She's already made an ass herself of herself, and she's only been involved for a month. What's next?" [ß YOU’RE NEXT, Psycho….]
As Ms. Smith vented her frustration, she wrote, "...playing bulletins and tapes of a deceased licensee, sound effects, endless playing of music, and general pre-pubescent behavior that quite a number of folks engage in on a daily basis at 14.275 needs to stop and needs to stop right now!"
We agree, although, a week later, at the time of this writing. It continues.... [ß Yes, it continues by your “anonymous” co-conspirators, inter alia your Bob EVANS WX4QN (the former WD4AWO) who repeatedly QRM’ed me on 14.275 MHz late on 8 Mar ’09.]
Ms. Smith continued in the same vein, throughout all 7 paragraphs of excited rhetoric. Unfortunately [ß “Unfortunately”? This has been the best thing to happen to the ARS since before ‘Rot’ Riley!], Ms. Smith unloaded her exasperation on two licensees, who were not the target of her obvious frustration. [ß Huhh? Non sequitur.] Apparently, her targets were Karol Madera, and, "the whole bunch of you." [ß Gentle reader: that’s what you get from sucking ‘Rot’ Riley’s cock for too long.]
Ms. Smith's main point was emphasized by the use of all caps, which is generally regarded as the e-version of shouting:
"RETALIATORY JAMMING WILL NOT BE TOLERATED AND IS IN VIOLATION OF THE RULES!"
Although she was only addressing two licensees, and we must stress again that neither licensee is the subject of current enforcement activity [ß Your source/mole?], she seemed to be writing for a wider audience.
"Can you tell I'm pissed?" Smith wrote. [ß We know already, above, and in e-shouting at that, Brian! So, why are you repeating this? After all ‘7 year-old children licencees’ could be reading this, HI.] "If you haven't yet figured it out let me clue you in here -- this behavior either stops now or everyone involved will find themselves on the receiving end of enforcement letters. This is an absolute disgrace -- I know kindergarteners that have shown a higher degree of maturity than the whole bunch of you!!"
We are not sure who "everyone involved" may be [ß It’s YOU and your Fucktards, Psycho.], or what kind of "enforcement letters" would be sent to "a whole bunch" of people, for violations of the unknown "lack of maturity" rule [ß Wait for it….], which has apparently been violated, but if we find out, you'll be the first to know.
Come to think of it, we've been waiting 3 years for the FCC to act on the license of Glenn Baxter, K1MAN, who received an affirmed Forfeiture in the amount of $21,000 on March 29, 2006, this after Baxter was finally fined, regarding complaints which the FCC had received since 1984.… [ß GL in the KKKontest!]
Insulting rhetoric, displaced anger, and feminine histrionics aside (but enough about Laura's email) we wish Laura Smith luck in her quest. Tracking down and writing "enforcement letters" to "a whole bunch" of anonymous Americans (?) licensed or not, will be a daunting task. [ß You seem to know a lot about this ‘bunch of anonymous Americans, licensed or not’. Why is that, Psycho?]
What are people saying about Laura Smith's email? [ß Are they your “human people” again, Psycho? (This was an ‘inside joke’ with Dr. PIPES.) Also, what’s with your anon. ‘he said/she said’ w/o names, from afar, on a cloaked website ‘as if’ by someone else ‘shtick’, Brian? Regardless, we’ll immediately take it to the (American) Bank, HI.]
We've received numerous comments (some frankly unprintable) [ß Print and be damned!] regarding what 9 out of 10 readers are calling "a complete lack of professionalism" and worse, with all that entails. [ß Lovely imitation, Psycho. Next time don’t forget the © thingy.]
Several attorneys [ß Much better than your usual “lots”, Dimmi.] wrote to comment that Ms. Smith is grossly in error regarding Part 97, as it applies to Madera's operation, were he a citizen of the United States. This is a moot point. Ms. Smith accurately observed that she has no jurisdiction in Canada, and any remarks made about Karol Madera, are obviously, her personal opinions. [ß Not so. She wrote qua SCARE.]
Some of our readers have stated their intention to send Ms. Smith's email to Dr. Kent Nilsson, FCC Inspector General, and to Kris Monteith, Chief of the FCC Enforcement Bureau, and others, including their Congressional Representatives, asking if Ms. Smith's hire truly represents the best interests of the people of the United States. [ß See earlier iterations, above, for what I think of this THREAT.]
Yet another reader wrote, "Surely Ms. Smith, has discovered the best way to ensure her own job security, while simultaneously spending hundreds of manhours [ß You’re sexist, PIG, HI.], and hundreds of thousands of taxpayer dollars, trying to track down countless anonymous individuals who engage in jamming out of pure frustration. [ß Convince them to engage you in muted circle jerks off-air/off the Internet instead.]
They jam a Canadian who spends an inordinate amount of time insulting what he calls the Excited States, while calling on al Qaida to slaughter Americans with roadside bombs." [ß Where does the quote begin, Dimmi?]
Others wrote to ask whether Ms. Smith was completely and properly vetted for the job; why the FCC hired someone with no experience in amateur radio matters, and; if Ms. Smith's hiring (at $200,000 ++) including salary and benefits, is really an appropriate use of taxpayer money, in this time of national fiscal crisis. [ß See earlier iteration, above, for what I think of this.]
For our part, Ms. Smith's good intentions notwithstanding [ß Brian: ‘not long ago I didn’t know how to spell ‘not-with-standing’ but now I “usually” suck cock on my knees’.], we fear Ms. Smith is destined to become even more frustrated. [ß Nowhere near as “frustrated” as you are, as this diatribe inter alia patently evidences.]
The lack of resources for amateur radio enforcement, and what the GAO called the "bureaucratic ineffectiveness" of the FCC, in general, along with the ingenuity of those jamming Madera's transmissions, and the sheer number of those engaged in civil disobedience, will all serve to make Ms. Smith's task a daunting one. [ß Wait for it, Psycho….]
K3VRN1FN in Fred ‘Hypocrite’ LLOYD AA7BQ’s “We don’t want your opinions here” on QRZ.com 9 Mar ‘09
Monday, June 7, 2010
Occasionally I assist various federal agencies in the apprehension of people at odds with society, and the law. My work with the government has brought me into contact with some very unsavory elements…. [ß We know, Psycho: Riley K4ZDH, Tom N1FM/n1sob, etc.] I have always prevailed against such enemies. You have been warned. [ß HAMereekan HUBRIS… needing ‘heavier metal treatment’ than the traditional but now much too valuable Lithium.]
Brian ‘At Odds With Society’ CROW K3VR delusional in ‘The Truth About www.suckK3VRoff.com‘ 26 Apr ‘09
Brian ‘At Odds With Society’ CROW K3VR delusional in ‘The Truth About www.suckK3VRoff.com‘ 26 Apr ‘09
Saturday, June 5, 2010
Smith's email of March, 2009 to two Arizona amateur operators exemplifies everything that's wrong with some of the attitudes in the federal government. Not all of the attitudes, mind you. Some federal employees are competent and dedicated public servants. [ß I believe that the latter refers to ‘Rot’ Riley and possibly also to the “3 Douchebags” in the FCC EB being hammered by Bill W6WBJ.]
However, Laura Smith's email, and her complete and utter failure to publicly apologize for her abusive rhetoric, is the kind of mean-spirited, arrogant, big government, holier-than-thou, talking-down-to-the-citizenry, CRAP that President Obama should attempt to completely purge from government, if he really wants to avoid widening the "confidence gap." [ß Congratulations, Laura, for being the 3rd person, in as many years, to be subject to this type of vitriol/‘odd formulary’ [FYI the “publicly apologize” demand was used on K1MAN & VE7KFM before you]. And speaking of “CRAP”, don’t even think of apologizing to a Socio/Psychopath and patent Coprophiliac.]
It's not just the blatant appearance of nepotism involved in Smith's hiring. Her husband and father-in-law both work/ed for the FCC, leading to an appearance of impropriety, at the very least. [ß Nepotism: only if you say so, Psycho. But why didn’t you mention that Laura was hired by your Right Wing punk, Kevin MARTIN, in the waning days of the Bush-wacker Era? Or is this too inconvenient for you?]
It's not the fact that she doesn't qualify for the most basic amateur radio license, yet she's tasked to exhibit expertise about the service. [ß Gentle reader: peruse ‘QeerZ’, which Psycho styles as ‘the most popular amateur radio website in the world’, for the amount of “expertise” exhibited by licensed HAMereekans.]
It's not the fact that she appears to lack subject matter competence when it comes to analyzing the technical matters required to do her job properly. [ß There are precious few “technical matters” on her plate. Arguably, everything Laura needs to discharge her ARS “subject matter competence”, she learned in Grade School.]
It's not even the lack of punishment involved in the Indianapolis Police Department Radio Scandal, that frankly stinks to heaven. [ß Is that anything like the ‘stink’ of your demonstrated anal/fecal obsession and Coprophilia, Brian? But, I agree: Laura should have had the criminals-in-uniform shot at dawn, before breakfast. Come to think of it, she still has a chance to atone for being a slow learner—by summarily “executing” Tom ‘Mother-Fucker’ WHATLEY N1FM/n1sob, YOUR sometime criminal-in-uniform.]
It's not any of those things. [ß OK. So, why the hyperbolic Litany, above?] Rather, it's her smug, condescending, abusive treatment of taxpayers and other FCC stakeholders that makes Laura Smith a DUD in her role as Special Counsel. [ß Nothing terribly wrong with “smug” or even “condescending”, if you’re talking to patent IDIOTS like YOU/yours and have “subject matter expertise” (the “Special Counsel” inter alia refers), unlike your ‘smug & descending’ (that’s “going down” in the vernacular) on your ‘Rot’ Riley in the Gettysburg Bath-House. As for “abusive”, just read your own prose herein and on this page alone, then look at the reflection in your computer monitor and seriously consider taking ‘The Final Exit’, like your sometime BUD ‘Rambo Dan’ did to such good effect recently.]
Laura Smith is ham radio's new poster child for what's wrong with the federal government…. [ß Bravo Laura! Can I have an autographed copy?]
The lack of confidence in government -- the gap many of us see and lament on a daily basis -- can be summed up by pointing frequently to those few insulting sentences written by Laura Smith of the FCC Enforcement Bureau:
"I sure wish we could regulate stupidity -- but it just isn't within the current confines of the rules. If it were, every single one of the actors here would be slapped with a fine just for being stupid/gullible and wasting my time..." [ß Despite his doctored ‘continuous loop’ tapes (used for malicious QRM’ing) incorporating this very formulary, Brian must also have forgotten what ‘Rot’ Riley said at the 2007 Hamvention (patently about HIM and his co-conspirators in the context): “We can’t regulate stupid!”]
I can't imagine why Laura Smith is still on the FCC's payroll. [ß Wait for it…. I can “imagine” her yanking YOUR licence, Psycho and soon.] Maybe it's just to remind us that talk is cheap, and cheap shots made via email are even cheaper. [ß There is nothing cheaper/scuzzier than FRAUDulent, ANONymous, Cloaked DEFAMATION obtusely written in the 3rd person by the likes of a ‘circle jerking’ coward like you, Brian!] By now it should be abundantly clear, that if President Obama's really serious about cutting costs, the FCC has some low-hanging fruit, just ripe for the picking. [ß Brian you Psycho, don’t forget to attribute “low-hanging fruit” to © ToeJoe N9PH.]
‘Psycho Brian’ K3VR continuing ‘circle jerk’/ratcheting up the ugliness against Laura, on his ANON website <28 Apr ‘09
However, Laura Smith's email, and her complete and utter failure to publicly apologize for her abusive rhetoric, is the kind of mean-spirited, arrogant, big government, holier-than-thou, talking-down-to-the-citizenry, CRAP that President Obama should attempt to completely purge from government, if he really wants to avoid widening the "confidence gap." [ß Congratulations, Laura, for being the 3rd person, in as many years, to be subject to this type of vitriol/‘odd formulary’ [FYI the “publicly apologize” demand was used on K1MAN & VE7KFM before you]. And speaking of “CRAP”, don’t even think of apologizing to a Socio/Psychopath and patent Coprophiliac.]
It's not just the blatant appearance of nepotism involved in Smith's hiring. Her husband and father-in-law both work/ed for the FCC, leading to an appearance of impropriety, at the very least. [ß Nepotism: only if you say so, Psycho. But why didn’t you mention that Laura was hired by your Right Wing punk, Kevin MARTIN, in the waning days of the Bush-wacker Era? Or is this too inconvenient for you?]
It's not the fact that she doesn't qualify for the most basic amateur radio license, yet she's tasked to exhibit expertise about the service. [ß Gentle reader: peruse ‘QeerZ’, which Psycho styles as ‘the most popular amateur radio website in the world’, for the amount of “expertise” exhibited by licensed HAMereekans.]
It's not the fact that she appears to lack subject matter competence when it comes to analyzing the technical matters required to do her job properly. [ß There are precious few “technical matters” on her plate. Arguably, everything Laura needs to discharge her ARS “subject matter competence”, she learned in Grade School.]
It's not even the lack of punishment involved in the Indianapolis Police Department Radio Scandal, that frankly stinks to heaven. [ß Is that anything like the ‘stink’ of your demonstrated anal/fecal obsession and Coprophilia, Brian? But, I agree: Laura should have had the criminals-in-uniform shot at dawn, before breakfast. Come to think of it, she still has a chance to atone for being a slow learner—by summarily “executing” Tom ‘Mother-Fucker’ WHATLEY N1FM/n1sob, YOUR sometime criminal-in-uniform.]
It's not any of those things. [ß OK. So, why the hyperbolic Litany, above?] Rather, it's her smug, condescending, abusive treatment of taxpayers and other FCC stakeholders that makes Laura Smith a DUD in her role as Special Counsel. [ß Nothing terribly wrong with “smug” or even “condescending”, if you’re talking to patent IDIOTS like YOU/yours and have “subject matter expertise” (the “Special Counsel” inter alia refers), unlike your ‘smug & descending’ (that’s “going down” in the vernacular) on your ‘Rot’ Riley in the Gettysburg Bath-House. As for “abusive”, just read your own prose herein and on this page alone, then look at the reflection in your computer monitor and seriously consider taking ‘The Final Exit’, like your sometime BUD ‘Rambo Dan’ did to such good effect recently.]
Laura Smith is ham radio's new poster child for what's wrong with the federal government…. [ß Bravo Laura! Can I have an autographed copy?]
The lack of confidence in government -- the gap many of us see and lament on a daily basis -- can be summed up by pointing frequently to those few insulting sentences written by Laura Smith of the FCC Enforcement Bureau:
"I sure wish we could regulate stupidity -- but it just isn't within the current confines of the rules. If it were, every single one of the actors here would be slapped with a fine just for being stupid/gullible and wasting my time..." [ß Despite his doctored ‘continuous loop’ tapes (used for malicious QRM’ing) incorporating this very formulary, Brian must also have forgotten what ‘Rot’ Riley said at the 2007 Hamvention (patently about HIM and his co-conspirators in the context): “We can’t regulate stupid!”]
I can't imagine why Laura Smith is still on the FCC's payroll. [ß Wait for it…. I can “imagine” her yanking YOUR licence, Psycho and soon.] Maybe it's just to remind us that talk is cheap, and cheap shots made via email are even cheaper. [ß There is nothing cheaper/scuzzier than FRAUDulent, ANONymous, Cloaked DEFAMATION obtusely written in the 3rd person by the likes of a ‘circle jerking’ coward like you, Brian!] By now it should be abundantly clear, that if President Obama's really serious about cutting costs, the FCC has some low-hanging fruit, just ripe for the picking. [ß Brian you Psycho, don’t forget to attribute “low-hanging fruit” to © ToeJoe N9PH.]
‘Psycho Brian’ K3VR continuing ‘circle jerk’/ratcheting up the ugliness against Laura, on his ANON website <28 Apr ‘09
Thursday, June 3, 2010
Tuesday, June 1, 2010
K3VR has sent you a link to a blog:
As you can see from this post, Dan [W4NTI (SK)] is alive and well and posting, numbnuts. [ß Non sequiturs, again/still Brian?] Your QSO with Dan was not illegal after all, so I'm letting you go this time. [ß Mighty white of you, Tonto.] Sooner or later, you'll screw up though, and then I'll nail you. [ß The way you’re going Brian, sooner or later someone is going to “nail you”—to the proverbial cross—or simply put a bullet in your head! Either way, I hope it’s sooner, Psycho.]
Brian ‘FRAUDulent Re-Mailer’ CROW K3VR to Mark on “ACCOUNTS OF THE KOSHER HAM” 9 Jun ‘09
As you can see from this post, Dan [W4NTI (SK)] is alive and well and posting, numbnuts. [ß Non sequiturs, again/still Brian?] Your QSO with Dan was not illegal after all, so I'm letting you go this time. [ß Mighty white of you, Tonto.] Sooner or later, you'll screw up though, and then I'll nail you. [ß The way you’re going Brian, sooner or later someone is going to “nail you”—to the proverbial cross—or simply put a bullet in your head! Either way, I hope it’s sooner, Psycho.]
Brian ‘FRAUDulent Re-Mailer’ CROW K3VR to Mark on “ACCOUNTS OF THE KOSHER HAM” 9 Jun ‘09
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
