Saturday, June 19, 2010

CANADA [and non]. KAROL MADERA, VE7KFM - NO PROTECTION UNDER US LAW

A spokesperson for the US government has confirmed that foreign amateur radio stations engaged in threats, obscenity, profanity, indecency, and/or jamming and deliberate interference, have no protection afforded them under US law.

CMSPIRG has learned that when VE7KFM transmits, he invariably engages in one or more of the above activities, therefore, no action will be taken against US licensees who talk over, or who otherwise interfere with VE7KFM's transmissions, provided such transmissions are otherwise legal and properly identified.

VE7KFM is not subject to US rules -- however, neither are VE7KFM's transmissions protected in the United States. The government source went on to say "We wouldn't take action against US licensees anyway, since we've discovered that Karol Madera is neither a credible witness, nor a credible victim."

See http://www.suckK3VRoff.com for further details (Brian Crow, PA, Jan 10, DX LISTENING DIGEST)


Brian ‘I Suck Riley’s & Glenn’s Cocks’ CROW K3VR in DX LD #7-005 10 Jan ’07 [but see latest, next]
Randy -- I don't particularly like what Karol says on the air -- but that does not mean that you (or anyone else) has the right to try to drive him off…. and to tell you the truth, even if I did have jurisdiction over Karol (which I DO NOT) nothing that I have heard thus far rises to the level of an actionable complaint….

Indeed, were Karol an American, his speech would fall squarely under the 1st Amendment -- you know that thing many of our forefathers fought and died for (not to mention our troops overseas right now). When you call yourself patriotic, built within that statement is the acceptance of the Constitution and all it entails -- free speech is one of the cornerstones of that fine document. It doesn't mean only the speech YOU agree with; or only the speech that the majority of folks agree with; or even only speech that isn't offensive to most mature, rational adults. It means ALL speech -- the good, the bad, and yes, even the ugly (as Karol is quite often wont to spout)….

What is within the confines of the rules, however is that fact that I can (AND WILL) enforce the rules against any Americans who cause harmful interference to Karol (and any of the folks who elect to engage him in QSOs). Let me repeat that so everyone understands it -- RETALIATORY JAMMING WILL NOT BE TOLERATED AND IS IN VIOLATION OF THE RULES!

I hope you all got my message here -- I have just about had it with the juvenile antics on the part of the American licensees. By the way, playing bulletins and tapes of a deceased licensee repeatedly in an effort to tie up the frequency so that Karol (and others) cannot use it actually does rise to the level of malicious interference -- and is subject to a possible enforcement action. Likewise, I won't even go into the ridiculous sound effects, endless playing of music, and general pre-pubescent behavior that quite a number of folks engage in on a daily basis at 14.275 -- again, all in an attempt to prevent Karol from engaging in QSOs. It needs to stop and needs to stop right now!


Gravamen of Laura L. SMITH a.k.a. “SCARE” e-mail [Bravo!] to Randy ‘Racist’ BEST W7CPA ~3 Mar ‘09

Thursday, June 17, 2010

Mark -- I don't particularly like what Karol says on the air -- but that does not mean that you (or anyone else) has the right to try to suck him off on the air…. and to tell you the truth, even if I did have jurisdiction over Karol (which I DO NOT) nothing that I have heard thus far indicates Karol is heterosexual….

Indeed, were Karol an American, his speech would fall squarely under the 1st Amendment -- you know that thing many of our forefathers fought and died for (not to mention our troops overseas right now). When you call yourself patriotic, built within that statement is the acceptance of the Constitution and all it entails -- free speech is one of the cornerstones of that fine document. It doesn't mean only the speech YOU agree with; or only the speech that the majority of folks agree with; or even only speech that isn't offensive to most mature, rational adults. It means ALL speech -- the good, the bad, and yes, even the ugly (as Karol is quite often wont to spout). So when Karol asks men to suck him off that's ok with me. And if Karol is gayer than a 3 dollar bill, that's ok too. It's obvious he's a cocksucker, isn't it? ….

He's just a gayboy, ok?….

I have requested that Karol tone down his campy transexual "act" on the air…. He is going to continue the tranny "act" and he's probably going to wear a pink boa and pick up quarters off the bar with his vagina -- and you guys thus far have demonstrated that you are going to continue falling into his trap. Why not just send him $100 and tell him to take his act to the Green Light Lounge?

A Canadian cocksucker's getting your panties twisted. What does that say about the cognitive abilities of the Americans as they are all being led around by a masturbating manipulator.

What is within the confines of the rules, however is that fact that I can (AND WILL) enforce the rules against any Americans who cause harmful interference to those who qrm Karol (and I'll fine any of the folks who elect to engage him in QSOs). Let me repeat that so everyone understands it -- RETALIATORY JAMMING WILL NOT BE TOLERATED AND IS IN VIOLATION OF THE RULES! AND IF I POST THIS IS IN ALL CAPS YOU MAY NOT REALIZE I'M A BLUFFING BULLSHITTER, JUST LIKE RILEY HOLLINGSWORTH, ESQUIRE.

I hope you all got my message here -- I have just about had it with the juvenile antics on the part of the American licensees. Stop the fag bashing! By the way, playing bulletins and tapes of a deceased licensee repeatedly in an effort to tie up the frequency so that Karol (and others) cannot use it actually doesn't rise to the level of malicious interference -- and is not subject to a possible enforcement action. Keep up the good work! Likewise, I won't even go into the ridiculous sound effects, endless playing of music, and general pre-pubescent behavior that quite a number of folks engage in on a daily basis at 14.275 -- again, all in an attempt to prevent Karol from engaging in QSOs. Excellent job! It needs to continue and I mean right now!

Can you tell I'm pissed? I just got my period and I'm wearing a white pants suit! If you haven't yet figured it out let me clue you in here -- My Prozac prescription expired 5 days ago! This behavior either stops now or everyone involved with Karol will find themselves on the receiving end of enforcement letters. I use pink stationery just like Todd's blog, which is an absolute disgrace -- I know kindergarteners that have shown a higher degree of maturity than the whole bunch of you prancing ponies!

Laura "on too much caffeine" at the Gettysburg Bath House


Elements of Brian ‘Hyper Homo-Sexual’ CROW K3VR ‘spoof’ [Bravo!] of Laura’s leaked e-mail 3 Mar ‘09

Tuesday, June 15, 2010

BREAKING NEWS:

14275 Saga Provokes 1,000 Word Email Rant by New FCC Enforceress

Referring to Karol Madera's speech [ß That’s Karol VE7KFM to you, Puke!], she offered her opinion, telling the licensees that the FCC regulates obscenity [the categories of which were here pointedly republished by Psycho for maximum negative effect]… would be protected speech in the US…. [ß Surprise, surprise!]

As for the numerous unknown individuals in violation of part 97…. [ß Bravo for ACK the obvious, Psycho, but you’re too obtuse by far!]

She continued in the same vein, throughout 7 paragraphs of excited rhetoric. [ß The “excited” is highly subjective, especially coming from someone who routinely uses hyper homo-sexual speech and wallows in coprophilia, Sicko!] Ms. Smith unloaded her apparent exasperation on two licensees, who were not necessarily the target of her obvious frustration…. [ß Huhh? There is only one licencee mentioned: your LYING co-conspirator Randy BEST W7CPA. So, who is the other and why the mention w/o any evidence? Also, are you again trying to read minds/intentions, Laura’s ~Standard if admittedly highly inconvenient English notwithstanding?]

Although she was only addressing two licensees, and we stress that neither licensee is the subject of current enforcement activity…. [ß Ditto, immediately above. We know already, Psycho! But why the “stress”? Are you under stress?]

We wish Laura Smith luck in her quest to track down and write letters to the hundreds of anonymous Americans (?) who have responded to, and who continue to respond to Karol Madera's America-bashing. [ß Bravo, on the sarcasm, Psycho!]

However, Ms. Smith's good intentions notwithstanding [ß Don’t imitate my diction, Dimmi.], we fear that the lack of resources for amateur radio enforcement, the bureaucratic ineffectiveness of the FCC in general, the ingenuity of those jamming Madera's transmissions [ß Tell Laura more, Brian.], and the sheer number of those engaged in civil disobedience [ß You’re the disobedient and Criminal SOB leading the “sheer number”!], will be a source of continued frustration for Ms. Smith. [ß If I’m not mistaken, all this is a challenge to Laura. GL in the KKKontest, Psycho!]


Brian’s 1st FRAUDulent Commentary on Laura’s Broadside in his www.suckK3VRoff.com 4 Mar ‘09

Monday, June 14, 2010

Sunday, June 13, 2010

BREAKING NEWS: [ß Compare/contrast this with the previous one, above.]

Since the email has been widely republished; and posted on at least three websites, and; it was apparently delivered via government email servers; written concerning public FCC business; appearing with Laura Smith's official FCC signature line; including the FCC email address, phone number, and fax number; the email is now firmly in the public domain…. [ß SOP. Modesty does NOT become you, Brian. Laura’s e-mail was initially leaked to and originally published and then re-published on the WWW by none other than YOU, Psycho!]

It's a lengthy email, at 1,000 words and seven paragraphs, and it outlines 'Ms. Smith's' views in colorful language, which may offend some readers. [ß But it’s not nearly as colourful/offensive as yours, here…. BTW How is your dog, “Tor”?]

She continued in the same vein, throughout 7 paragraphs of excited rhetoric. Ms. Smith unloaded her apparent exasperation on two licensees, who were not the target of her obvious frustration [ß We know already, Brian. No need to underline.]. Apparently, her targets were Karol Madera [ß Did I ever tell you that Brian’s brain is wired 180 degrees out of phase?], and, "the whole bunch of you," whosoever that may be. Her main point was emphasized by the use of all caps, generally regarded as the e-version of shouting…. [ß But thankfully not yet screaming, HI. Beware the woman screaming, Psycho….]

We wish Laura Smith luck in her quest to track down and write enforcement letters to the hundreds of anonymous Americans (?) who have responded to, and who continue to respond to, Karol Madera's America-bashing and affiliation with al Qaeda…. [ß Just call me “Al Qaeda Northern Command” for short.]

We have received numerous comments (some frankly unprintable) [ß You’re much too modest, Sicko!] regarding what 9 out of 10 readers are calling "a complete lack of professionalism" and worse. [ß The “9 out of 10” was Psycho Brian erroneously counting Mrs. Palmer’s pinkies, while engaging in an “excited” circle jerk, with himself.] We decline to publish personal attacks against Ms. Smith. [ß Of course, Brian. Your comments here are a Testament to your exemplary decorum.] Ms. Smith has an opportunity to comment further, through our information portal, or through official FCC channels, should she wish to do so. [ß Huhh?]

Some of our readers have stated their intention to send the email to Dr. Kent Nilsson, FCC Inspector General [ß GL. Congress 3 months ago stated: “Serious allegations against Dr. Nilsson are pending before PCIE”.], and to Kris Monteith, Chief of the FCC Enforcement Bureau [ß Whom Bill W6WBJ only a month ago accused of Misleading Justice], and others, including their Congressional Representatives [ß I recommend contacting the authors of the Congressional Report “DECEPTION AND DISTRUST: THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION UNDER KEVIN J. MARTIN”], asking if Ms. Smith's hire truly represents the best interests of the people of the United States. [ß Truly, I don’t know, not being a HAMereekan…. But her action against your Randy ‘Racist’ BEST W7CPA w/o question was in the best interest of the ITU/World.]

Others wrote to ask whether she was completely and properly vetted for the job [ß Psycho, YOU spoke with and subsequently “vetted” her on your QeerZ, remember?]; why the FCC hired someone with no experience in amateur radio matters [ß Precisely so YOU could not suck her off, as you did your Riley, remember?]; and if her hiring (at $200,000 ++) including salary and benefits, is really an appropriate use of taxpayer money, at a time of fiscal crisis. [ß Fuck your ‘Jewish Engineered’ Wall Street Crisis! If Laura pulls your licence, as she should—and/or arranges ‘room & board’ for you and your Criminal co-conspirators—her salary for at least one year will be more than offset by FRAUDulently instigated investigations NOT undertaken by your incompetent ‘alphabet soup’ thugs and ours.]

For our part, Ms. Smith's good intentions notwithstanding, we fear that the lack of resources for amateur radio enforcement, what the GAO called the "bureaucratic ineffectiveness" of the FCC in general, the ingenuity of those jamming Madera's transmissions, and the sheer number of those engaged in civil disobedience, will be a source of continued frustration for Ms. Smith.


Brian’s 2nd seriously FRAUDulent Commentary, ratcheting up the ugliness, on his website 5 Mar ‘09

Saturday, June 12, 2010